JN0-683 Data Center Professional (JNCIP-DC) Exam Questions and Answers

ERB Architecture in EVPN-VXLAN:

ERB (Edge Routed Bridging) architecture is commonly used in data center networks where routing decisions are made at the network edge (leaf or border devices), while bridging (Layer 2 forwarding) is extended across the fabric. This architecture allows for efficient L3 routing while still enabling L2 services like VLANs to span across multiple locations.

VLAN and VNI Configuration:

The scenario specifies that a server on the Red VLAN needs to communicate with a server on the Green VLAN. Since these VLANs are in different data centers (DC and DC2), and given the use of EVPN-VXLAN, the communication between these VLANs will require atransit VNI(Virtual Network Identifier). This transit VNI will allow traffic to traverse the VXLAN tunnel across the DCI (Data Center Interconnect).

Interconnect between SRX Series Devices:

The exhibit shows SRX Series Chassis Clusters used as service devices (likely for firewalling or other security services). These devices need to be interconnected between the two data centers to ensure that VLANs can communicate effectively. The Blue VLAN needs to be stretched between DC and DC2 to maintain the same Layer 2 domain across both data centers.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Interconnecting the SRX Series devices will ensure the necessary service chaining, while stretching the Blue VLAN and adding a transit VNI for the Red and Green VLANs will enable the required communication across the data centers.

Scenario Overview:

Converting an MX Series router from a VXLAN Layer 2 gateway to a VXLAN Layer 3 gateway involves transitioning the router's functionality from simply bridging traffic within a VXLAN segment to routing traffic between different segments.

Key Configuration Requirement:

IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging) Interface:An IRB interface allows for both Layer 2 switching and Layer 3 routing. To enable routing for a specific VNI (VXLAN Network Identifier), the IRB interface must be associated with the routing function in the corresponding bridge domain.

Correct Command:

C. set bridge-domains VLAN-100 routing-interface irb.100:This command correctly binds the IRB interface to the bridge domain, enabling Layer 3 routing functionality within the VXLAN for VNI 100. This effectively transitions the device from operating solely as a Layer 2 gateway to a Layer 3 gateway.

Data Center References:

This configuration step is essential when converting a Layer 2 VXLAN gateway to a Layer 3 gateway, enabling the MX Series router to route between VXLAN segments.

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Routing in EVPN-VXLAN:

Symmetric Routing:Traffic enters and exits the VXLAN network through the same VTEP, regardless of the source or destination. This approach simplifies routing decisions, especially in large networks, and is generally more scalable.

Asymmetric Routing:The routing occurs on the egress VTEP. This method can be simpler to deploy in smaller environments but becomes complex as the network scales, particularly with larger numbers of VNIs and VLANs.

Correct Statements:

C. Symmetric routing supports higher scaling numbers:Symmetric routing is preferred in larger EVPN-VXLAN deployments because it centralizes routing decisions, which can be more easily managed and scaled.

D. Asymmetric routing routes traffic on the egress switch:This is accurate, as asymmetric routing means the routing decision is made at the final hop, i.e., the egress VTEP before the traffic reaches its destination.

Incorrect Statements:

A. Symmetric routing needs an extra VLAN with an IRB interface for each L3 VRF instance:This is not accurate. Symmetric routing does not require an extra VLAN per VRF; rather, it uses the same VLAN/VNI across the network, simplifying routing and VLAN management.

B. Asymmetric routing is easier to monitor because of the transit VNI:Asymmetric routing is not necessarily easier to monitor; in fact, it can add complexity due to the split routing logic between ingress and egress points.

Data Center References:

The choice between symmetric and asymmetric routing in an EVPN-VXLAN environment depends on network size, complexity, and specific operational requirements. Symmetric routing is generally more scalable and easier to manage in large-scale deployments.

Understanding the Configuration:

The exhibit shows a BGP configuration on a Border-Leaf device. The BGP group UNDERLAY is used for the underlay network, OVERLAY for EVPN signaling, and PROVIDER for connecting to the provider network.

The OVERLAY group has the accept-remote-nexthop statement, which is designed to accept the next-hop address learned from the remote peer as is, without modifying it.

Problem Identification:

The BGP session to Border-Leaf-2 is not established. A common issue in EVPN-VXLAN environments is related to next-hop reachability, especially when accept-remote-nexthop is configured.

In typical EVPN-VXLAN setups, the next-hop address should be reachable within the overlay network. However, the accept-remote-nexthop can cause issues if the next-hop IP address is not directly reachable or conflicts with the expected behavior in the overlay.

Corrective Action:

D. delete protocols bgp group OVERLAY accept-remote-nexthop:Removing this command will ensure that the device uses its own IP address as the next-hop in BGP advertisements, which is standard practice in many EVPN-VXLAN setups. This change should help establish the BGP session with Border-Leaf-2.

Data Center References:

Proper handling of BGP next-hop attributes is critical in establishing and maintaining stable BGP sessions, especially in complex multi-fabric environments like EVPN-VXLAN. Removing accept-remote-nexthop aligns with best practices in many scenarios.

 EVPN-VXLAN Configuration:

The configuration provided in the exhibit shows an EVPN-VXLAN setup where IP prefix routes are exchanged between two sites. The advertise direct-nexthop option and the VNI (Virtual Network Identifier) settings are crucial in this context.

 Advertise Direct-Nexthop:

Option A:The advertise direct-nexthop option ensures that the next-hop route is resolved using only the information carried in the EVPN Type 5 route. Type 5 routes are used for IP prefix advertisement in EVPN, which is key to enabling Layer 3 interconnectivity between different VXLAN segments.

 VNI Consistency:

Option C:For the same customer across different devices, the VNI must be consistent. This consistency ensures that all devices can correctly map traffic to the appropriate VXLAN segment, maintaining seamless Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity.

VXLAN Group-Based Policies (GBP):

VXLAN Group-Based Policies are used to apply security policies consistently across the network. These policies are often tied to user or device identities rather than static IP addresses, which allows for more dynamic and scalable security management.

Scalable Group Tags via RADIUS and 802.1X:

Option B:VXLAN GBP can use scalable group tags configured on a RADIUS server, which are then pushed to network devices through 802.1X. This allows for centralized and automated policy application based on user or device identity.

Consistent Security Policy Application:

Option C:GBP ensures that security policies are consistently applied across the network, regardless of where a user or device connects. This consistency is crucial in environments where security policies must follow the user or device.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Group tags can be configured on a RADIUS server and pushed via 802.1X, enabling centralized policy management.

Option C:Correct—GBP ensures consistent application of security policies, which is essential for maintaining security across a dynamic network environment.

Interconnecting Data Centers:

The scenario requires interconnecting two data centers with unique IP spaces across an IP backbone. The key point is that bridging is not required, so Layer 3 routing methods must be used.

EVPN Configuration:

Option B:Establishing EVPN peering between the border leaf nodes in each data center is the most appropriate solution as it allows for exchanging routing information between the two data centers. This ensures that the routes are properly distributed without the need for L2 bridging.

Option C:Configuring Type 5 EVPN routes is necessary for advertising IP prefixes (Layer 3 routes) across the EVPN. Type 5 routes allow for the exchange of IP prefixes between the two data centers, enabling the necessary routing functionality without the need for bridging.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Peering between border leaf nodes sets up the necessary route exchange between data centers.

Option C:Correct—Type 5 EVPN routes are essential for exchanging Layer 3 prefixes between data centers.

VXLAN Traffic Verification:

To ensure VXLAN traffic from the xe-0/0/12 interface is correctly encapsulated by the logical vtep.32770 and sent to a remote leaf device, it is essential to monitor the relevant interface statistics.

The command show interfaces terse vtep.32770 statistics provides a concise overview of the traffic statistics for the specific VTEP interface, which can help verify whether traffic is being correctly encapsulated and transmitted.

Explanation:

This command is particularly useful for quickly checking the traffic counters and identifying any potential issues with VXLAN encapsulation or transmission.

It allows you to confirm that traffic is flowing as expected, by checking the transmitted and received packet counters.

Data Center References:

Monitoring interface statistics is a crucial step in troubleshooting and validating network traffic, particularly in complex overlay environments like EVPN-VXLAN.

Understanding Oversubscription in a Clos Fabric:

The oversubscription ratio in a Clos IP fabric measures the ratio of the amount of edge (leaf) bandwidth to the core (spine) bandwidth. An oversubscription ratio of 3:1 means that there is three times more edge bandwidth compared to core bandwidth.

Impact of Adding/Removing Spine Devices:

Option C:If youremove spine devices, the total available core bandwidth decreases, while the edge bandwidth remains the same. This results in anincrease in the oversubscription ratiobecause there is now less core bandwidth to handle the same amount of edge traffic.

Option B:Conversely, if youadd spine devices, the total core bandwidth increases. This decreases the oversubscription ratio because more core bandwidth is available to handle the edge traffic.

Conclusion:

Option C:Correct—Removing spine devices increases the oversubscription ratio.

Option B:Correct—Adding spine devices decreases the oversubscription ratio.

Requirement Analysis:

The scenario requires a solution to interconnect two data centers that supports EVPN Type 2 connectivity. The solution must be highly scalable and must minimize the number of VXLAN tunnels between border leaf devices.

Understanding Type 2 Seamless Stitching:

Option D:Type 2 seamless stitchingis a method used in EVPN to provide Layer 2 connectivity (such as MAC address mobility) across different VXLAN segments. It is scalable because it allows only necessary tunnels to be established between border leaf devices, reducing the overhead of maintaining a full mesh of VXLAN tunnels.

Conclusion:

Option D:Correct—Type 2 seamless stitching satisfies the requirement by enabling scalable, efficient interconnection of two data centers with minimal VXLAN tunnels.

Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI):

The Junos Telemetry Interface is a framework that allows network operators to collect real-time telemetry data from Juniper devices. This data can be used for monitoring, analytics, and network automation.

Data Export Methods:

Option B:UDP (User Datagram Protocol)is a lightweight, connectionless protocol used for exporting telemetry data quickly with minimal overhead. While it doesn't guarantee delivery, it is suitable for high-speed data transfer where occasional packet loss is acceptable.

Option D:gRPC (gRPC Remote Procedure Call)is a modern, high-performance method for data export that supports streaming and remote procedure calls, making it ideal for more complex telemetry data use cases.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—UDP is supported for exporting telemetry data.

Option D:Correct—gRPC is also supported, offering advanced streaming capabilities

Symmetric IRB Routing with EVPN Type 2 Routes:

Symmetric Routing: In symmetric IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging), routing occurs in both directions at the ingress and egress leaf nodes using the same routing logic. This is contrasted with asymmetric routing, where different routing logic is used depending on the direction of the traffic.

Required Components:

Option A:An L3 IRB interface is necessary for each VLAN that participates in routing, as it handles the Layer 3 processing for the VLAN.

Option B:MAC-VRF is required for symmetric routing to maintain a mapping of MAC addresses to the appropriate VRF, ensuring correct forwarding within the EVPN.

Option D:A transit VNI (Virtual Network Identifier) is required for each VRF to encapsulate the Layer 3 traffic as it traverses the network, allowing the IP traffic to be appropriately forwarded.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—Each local VLAN needs an IRB interface for L3 processing.

Option B:Correct—MAC-VRF is necessary for handling MAC address resolution in symmetric routing.

Option D:Correct—Transit VNIs are required for routing VRF-specific traffic across the network.

OptionsCandEare incorrect because:

C:Symmetric routing can work with various VLAN models, including single or multiple VLANs within an EVPN instance.

E:Symmetric routing is generally more efficient than asymmetric routing as it uses consistent routing logic in both directions.

Telemetry in Data Centers:

Telemetry allows for real-time monitoring of network devices by collecting and exporting data such as interface statistics, routing table updates, and other key metrics.

Vendor-Neutral Data Models:

Option A:JTI (Junos Telemetry Interface) OpenConfig sensors use a vendor-neutral data model, which is important for ensuring compatibility across different network devices and systems. OpenConfig is an industry-standard model, which facilitates integration with various telemetry collection systems.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—OpenConfig sensors provide a vendor-neutral solution for telemetry, ensuring broad compatibility and flexibility in data center environments.

Understanding the Scenario:

EVPN-VXLAN deployments often involve scenarios where multiple tenants or applications require overlapping VLAN IDs, which can be managed using the mac-vrf routing instance type. This allows you to segregate traffic within the same VLAN ID across different tenants.

Host-facing Interface Configuration:

A. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using a service-provider style configuration:This is correct. In mac-vrf configurations, host-facing interfaces (those connecting end devices) typically follow a service-provider style configuration, where each customer or tenant's traffic is isolated even if overlapping VLAN IDs are used.

B. Host-facing interfaces must be configured using enterprise-style configuration:This is incorrect for mac-vrf instances because enterprise-style configurations are more common in simpler, less segmented networks.

Routing Instance Service Type:

D. The routing-instance service type can be VLAN-based:This is correct. The service type in mac-vrf can indeed be VLAN-based, which is particularly useful in scenarios where VLAN ID overlap is needed between different tenants or services.

Data Center References:

The mac-vrf instance type is powerful for handling complex multi-tenant environments in EVPN-VXLAN, especially when dealing with overlapping VLAN IDs across different segments of the network.

Understanding the Scenario:

In an EVPN-VXLAN environment, when using multi-homing in active/active scenarios, there's a risk that a multihomed server might receive duplicate copies of Broadcast, Unknown unicast, and Multicast (BUM) traffic. This is because multiple VTEPs might forward the same BUM traffic to the server.

EVPN Route Types:

Type 4 Route (Ethernet Segment Route):This route type is used to advertise the Ethernet Segment (ES) to which the device is connected. It is specifically used in multi-homing scenarios to signal the ES and its associated Ethernet Tag to all the remote VTEPs. The Type 4 route includes information that helps prevent BUM traffic duplication in active/active multi-homing by using a split-horizon mechanism, which ensures that traffic sent to a multihomed device does not get looped back.

Explanation:

The Type 4 route is crucial for ensuring that in a multi-homed setup, particularly in an active/active configuration, BUM traffic does not result in duplication at the server. The route helps coordinate which VTEP is responsible for forwarding the BUM traffic to the server, thereby preventing duplicate traffic.

Data Center References:

Type 4 routes are essential for managing multi-homing in EVPN to avoid the issues of BUM traffic duplication, which could otherwise lead to inefficiencies and potential network issues.