L4M5 Commercial Negotiation Questions and Answers

In microeconomics, equilibrium price is determined when the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied at equilibrium price in a market, there will be no shortages and no surpluses. If we combine our supply and demand curves on one graph, the point at which they converge determines the equilibrium price. If the price is set above this price and you read across the graph you will see the supply excess demand and there will be a surplus. In order to reduce this surplus, the price will need to fall. The scenario is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart, line chart Description automatically generated

A perfectly competitive market is one with the following features:

- There are many firms producing identical or very similar (homogeneous) goods or services

- There are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market - anyone can enter or leave easily

- Both producers and customers have perfect knowledge of the market place, prices, costs of production and influences on demand and supply

Under these conditions, the price and quantity will always tend toward equilibrium as any producer that sets a price above equilibrium will not sell anything at all, and any producer that sets a price below a equilibrium will obtain 100% market share in theory. The demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. In a perfectly competitive market, it is difficult to increase profits through pricing, and suppliers instead must focus on their cost structure. As these conditions imply, there are few if any examples of perfectly competitive market.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Variable pricing can lead to budgeting challenges and financial uncertainty over a 12-month period. While variable pricing may allow flexibility, it complicates financial planning and forecasting. For predictable budgeting and reduced financial risk, fixed pricing is typicallypreferred in such contract durations, aligning with CIPS recommendations on pricing models in contract management.

There are multiple sources of divergent positions that can arise in situations where money is exchange for goods and services. There are 2 different types of sources. Those that arise from the content or subject matter of the negotiation (what is being negotiated) and those that arise from the process of negotiation (how it is being negotiated).

Sources of divergent position - the content of negotiation:

Table Description automatically generated

Cultural differences are the source of conflict in the process of negotiation.

Requisition is an internal document raised by user or store to communicate to procurement the need to buy the product or service specified. This is merely a internal document.

Framework arrangement is a rather loose set-up, without any legal standing. It usually occurs when an organisation has decided for itself to limit the number of suppliers it is willing to work with and, through a purely internal process, sets up an approved list of such suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Closed questions are useful for verifying facts, as they prompt specific, concise responses. These questions allow the negotiator to confirm details without ambiguity, which is crucial for clarity in negotiation settings, as highlighted in CIPS’s guidelines on questioning techniques.

In fixed-price agreements, cost-overrun risk is transferred to the supplier, giving the buyer price certainty and reducing the need for ongoing cost scrutiny. Monitoring focuses on delivery to specification and timing, not on the supplier’s internal cost build-up (unlike cost-plus).

Negotiating at the supplier's site can give the supplier a psychological advantage due to their familiarity with the setting. To ensure a neutral and balanced negotiation environment, it’s preferable to conduct negotiations in a neutral location or through structured channels, as recommended in CIPS's guidance on negotiation settings.

Lina is asking a probing question to gather more detailed information on the actions GBG is taking to address quality issues. Probing questions are intended to delve deeper into a topic and elicit specific details, making them suitable for understanding underlying issues, as per CIPS’s negotiation question types.

The typical stages of commercial negotiation are Preparing, opening, bargaining, agreement, and closure. This sequence facilitates a structured approach where negotiators prepare strategies, initiate discussions, engage in bargaining, reach agreements, and formally close the negotiation. This structure is emphasized in CIPS materials as essential for achieving a balanced negotiation process.

Once the contract has expired, the buyer no longer has contractual protection on pricing, which significantly weakens their position. However, this situation also creates an opportunity to re-establish leverage by offering future value. By proposing a new or extended contract, the buyer introduces certainty, continuity of business, and potential volume commitment for the supplier, which can be traded in return for moderated pricing. Accepting the increase without challenge offers no commercial control, while threats or immediate cancellation risk damaging the relationship and supply continuity. CIPS guidance emphasises using future commitment as a bargaining lever, especially when informal negotiations fail and contractual leverage no longer exists.

Tradeables—variables such as price, delivery, quality, and payment terms—are introduced in the bargaining stage of negotiations. This is the phase where both parties test positions, make concessions, and trade issues to create acceptable packages. Proposing and opening are earlier stages focused on setting out agendas and clarifying needs, while closure comes after tradeables are resolved. Introducing tradeables too early can weaken leverage, and leaving them too late risks deadlock. Bargaining ensures the structured exchange of concessions while protecting the overall bargaining mix.

In a win-lose outcome, tactics often involve lowering the other party’s resistance point (1) and convincing them that the offer is the best possible (2). These strategies are designed to maximize advantage for one party at the expense of the other, fitting with CIPS’s win-lose negotiation techniques.

The effect of a change of relative exchange rates will be determined by which currency you pay your supplier in.

Table Description automatically generated

LO 2, AC 2.2

A partnership is characterised by trust, mutual respect, and joint sharing of risks and rewards. Both sides collaborate on innovation and improvement. In contrast, transactional or arm’s-length relationships are short-term and price-driven, while outsourcing simply transfers responsibility without guaranteeing collaboration. CIPS emphasises partnerships as enablers of integrative negotiations, where joint value and long-term benefits can be achieved.

This is a closed question because it requires a definite, factual response such as “yes” or “no”. Closed questions are particularly useful in negotiations for confirming specific commitments, including delivery dates, prices, quantities, or contractual terms. They reduce ambiguity and are commonly used during the later stages of negotiation to confirm agreement and progress toward closure. Probing questions seek deeper explanation, leading questions influence the answer, and multiple questions combine several issues at once. CIPS highlights the importance of choosing question styles appropriately depending on the negotiation objective and stage.

The mark-up percentage is calculated as the profit divided by the cost of production, then multiplied by 100 to convert it into a percentage.

Calculation:

(

80

/

160

)

×

100

=

50

%

(80/160)×100=50%

Thus, the supplier’s mark-up percentage is 50%, as per standard pricing calculations used in procurement.

Supplier conditioning is the process of influencing a supplier or suppliers to behave in a certain way, or to accept certain circumstances. Within a negotiation, the buyer needs to make sure that the supplier has a number of messages in mind, about the outcomes that the buyer needs to achieve and about the shared sense of purpose that buying organisation has in achieving these outcomes.

Supplier appraisal is a process of evaluating a supplier's ability to carry out a contract in term of quality, delivery, price and other contributing factors.

Supplier positioning is the process of classifying spend with a supplier in terms of the profit potential and supply risk and assists in prioritising categories of spend and developing the right strategy.

Supplier selection is the process of selecting a supplier to acquire the necessary materials to support the outputs of organisations. Selection of the best and/or the most suitable suppliers is based on assessing supplier capabilities (Shih et al., 2004).

A BATNA provides the buyer with the confidence to walk away if terms are not favorable, ensuring they don’t settle for a suboptimal agreement. Knowing the best alternative enables buyers to negotiate from a position of strength, as per CIPS’s guidance on negotiation strategies.

Margin is defined as profit expressed as a percentage of the selling price, not the cost. This is a critical distinction from mark-up, which expresses profit as a percentage of cost. For example, a 20% margin means that 20% of the price charged to the buyer represents profit, while 80% represents cost. CIPS emphasises that buyers must clearly understand this difference to avoid being misled during pricing discussions. Confusing margin with mark-up can significantly weaken negotiation effectiveness.

The coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish others for non-compliance. It can be considered as opposite to reward power, which results from one person's ability to compensate or reward another for compliance.

LO 1, AC 1.3

The following graph shows the factors that shift the supply curve to the left and to the right.

Mendelow’s Matrix categorises stakeholders by power and interest. High-interest, low-power stakeholders must be kept informed, as they care about outcomes but lack direct influence. Keeping them informed builds trust and reduces resistance. By contrast, high power/interest stakeholders are key players, while low power/low interest require minimal effort. This tool ensures negotiation strategies align with stakeholder dynamics, preventing overlooked risks or conflicts.

In 1959, French and Raven described five bases of power:

1. Legitimate – This comes from the belief that a person has the formal right to make demands, and to expect others to be compliant and obedient.

2. Reward – This results from one person's ability to compensate another for compliance.

3. Expert – This is based on a person's high levels of skill and knowledge.

4. Referent – This is the result of a person's perceived attractiveness, worthiness and right to others' respect.

5. Coercive – This comes from the belief that a person can punish others for noncompliance.

Six years later, Raven added an extra power base:

6. Informational – This results from a person's ability to control the information that others need to accomplish something.

In the scenario, Neville attracts and keeps good relationship with his colleagues not because of neither position nor reward nor coercion. He has good skills and kindness, which increase his charisma. His source of power is referent power.

Fixed costs are costs that do not vary directly with production volume. Staff salaries and building rents remain largely constant regardless of output levels and therefore meet the definition of fixed costs. Raw materials and temporary labour vary with production levels and are therefore variable costs. Warehouse logistics often fluctuate with throughput and activity, making them variable or semi-variable rather than fixed. Understanding fixed versus variable costs is essential for buyers when assessing supplier justifications for price increases, enabling more informed and credible cost-based negotiations.

At the proposing phase either side may start making tentative proposals regarding their offering. In the case of negotiation where TOP has already submitted a tender or proposal, this stage may provide an opportunity for them to make proposals to improve on their initial offers in general or in areas highlighted by the buying side in advance.

The word 'if' is very useful at this stage and allows you to test tentative proposals without committing yourself. Skilled negotiators use language very carefully. The questions with 'if' are hypothetical ones.

LO 3, AC 3.1

The question asks about the point in time when Jane should make concessions with the supplier. These concessions should be traded after preliminary stages such as opening, testing and proposing are over and proposals move from being tentative and general to being more definite and specific. This stage is called bargaining phase. The bargaining phase is the 'meat' of the negotiation meeting.

LO 3, AC 3.1

The question requires more detailed answer, it is an example of probing question.

Probing questions are typically follow-up questions, and aim to elicit more detailed information on the back of the answer elicited from the open questions. Probing question are also useful to check that the supplier fully understand their offering, as well as your needs, can also be used to communicate to the suppliers that you know this category well.

LO 3, AC 3.3

Afixed price agreementprovides the buyer withcost predictability. Once the price is agreed upon, the buyer is insulated from any cost increases on the supplier's side. The supplier bears the risk of fluctuating input prices, which simplifies cost control and contract administration for the buyer.

“With a fixed price arrangement, the buyer is protected from future price increases and does not need to monitor the supplier’s ongoing costs. This is particularly useful for budgeting and forecasting.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Fixed Price Agreements)

During the proposing stage, parties move toward agreement by narrowing down a wide range of potential options. This helps focus the negotiation and aligns both parties toward practical, mutual outcomes. It's an essential step to keep the process structured and productive.

Integrative negotiationfocuses onmutual gainand long-term collaboration. It seeks tomaximize joint outcomesand encourages parties to align interests andpursue shared goals. This contrasts with distributive tactics that prioritize individual wins and short-term gains.

“Integrative negotiations aim to create outcomes where both parties benefit. Shared problem-solving, information exchange, and joint goal pursuit are central features of this approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Principles of Integrative Negotiation)

Distributive negotiation carries several risks beyond justlosing out on value. These includedamaging supplier relationships,eroding trust, andreaching an impasse, where neither party can agree. This could result in delayed projects, increased costs, or supplier withdrawal.

“Distributive negotiation can lead to a breakdown in communication, impasses, and long-term relationship damage. The win-lose mindset can prevent collaborative problem-solving.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Risks of Distributive Approaches)

There are several pricing strategies used by suppliers:

Cost-plus pricing – Total variable + Fixed cost + profit

Premium pricing – based on branding. Supplier determines to charge a very high price, not connected with cost structures, usually based on its reputation and/or the perception that the product/service is of

a superior quality. This strategy typically found in the early part of the product life cycle/when demand exceeds supply.

Penetration pricing - Supplier attempts to enter a new market or extend its share in an established one. It is characterised by price reductions to increase volume, followed by steady price increases; may

even be loss leading at start (no profit made)

Marginal cost pricing – covers only variable cost

Market pricing – suppliers prices in line with what the market is willing to pay

The assumption is false, because when a procurement professional negotiates on behalf of his employer, he brings the power of his organisation (its brand, reputation and purchasing spend) as well his own personal power (that which is embedded within him) to the negotiation.

From a negotiation perspective, both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the behaviours of other or the cause of event. This power is clearly core to negotiation, and of enormous important in seeking to achieve the objectives.

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100609100650/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Cost_Price_analysis(1).pdf

LO 2, AC 2.1

'Macroeconomic factors always directly influence the negotiations': This statement is false. For any given negotiation it is not the macroeconomic factor itself that necessarily influences the negotiation but the change or rate of change that factor.

'Changes in macroeconomic factors may affect businesses and individuals differently': This statement is true. Macroeconomic factors are factors that have general effects on the economy and many businesses may be completely unaffected or affected more or less than others in the same industry by a change in a factor.

'Macroeconomic factors cannot be influenced by anyone's expectation or sentiment': This statement is false. When it comes to macroeconomic factors another key consideration is expectation regarding what might happen to these factors, or specifically the measures, metrics or percentage rates associated with these factors in the future.

'Expectations on macroeconomic prospect are always correct': This statement is false. Expectations are not always correct.

LO 2, AC 2.2

In the recovery phase, economies move out of recession: consumer spending rises, demand grows, and prices begin to stabilise or increase. Confidence improves, investment starts picking up, and spare capacity is gradually absorbed. Low confidence and falling investment are features of recession, while full capacity is linked to boom phases. For negotiators, recovery phases may mean suppliers regain confidence to raise prices, requiring careful market analysis.

Indirect costs are those cost that are not directly attributable to production. Examples of indirect costs including the following:

Indirect labour: This covers every person in the factory who does not directly perform a production operation such as managers, supervisors, engineers, store personnel, clerks, maintenance staff, porters, canteen staff, security and cleaners etc.

Expenses: Included in this element is every fixed and variable expenses incurred in operating the factory, such as rent, rates, utilities, insurance, depreciation, maintenance, air conditioning and the various types of energy generation required by a clothing factory.

Indirect materials: Also known as consumables, this element contains all the materials not directly connected to the makeup of a garment. Some of the typical items involved are office materials, spare parts, marker paper, maintenance materials, chalk & pins.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production. Examples of direct costs including the following:

Direct Materials: Direct materials are all the materials and trimmings which go into the construction and finish of the garment. Typically, these materials would include cloth, lining, fusible, zips pads, tapes, labels, tickets, hangers and packaging materials.

Direct Labour: This cover the cost of all the labor directly involved in producing the garment and could include cutting, fusing, regular sewing, special machine operations, pressing, finishing, inspection and packing. Labor of all types and grade has a direct overhead which include holiday pay, sick pay, fringe benefits etc and the statutory payments made by the employer for each employee. This is usually expressed as a percentage of salary and when this percentage is added to the employee’s wage, it becomes the basis for calculating direct labor costs.

In the MIL framework, “Must have” refers to non-negotiable elements. For Colin’s organisation,ethical and sustainable procurementis a core, uncompromisable value, making it a “Must have” in negotiations.

Packaging is considered a variable cost because it fluctuates with the level of production or sales activity. Variable costs change directly in relation to the volume of output or service. In contrast:

Rent (A), Loan repayments (B), and Insurance (C) are fixed costs, as they generally do not vary with production levels within a certain range. These are recurring costs that remain constant over time, aligning with CIPS's cost classification in procurement.

There are 3 major costing methods:

Marginal costing

• Uses marginal cost of producing addition units

• Uses variable cost to derived a unit cost (does not include fixed cost)

• Fixed cost treated as a ‘period cost’ and deducted, as a total amount, from total contribution to profit for the period, in the firm’s profit and loss account

Absorption costing

• Calculates total cost of producing product

• In addition to variable cost, a fair proportion of fixed cost is allocated to (absorbed) each unit of output, as a fixed cost per unit

Activity based costing

• Similar to absorption costing but with fixed cost allocated to products on the basis of the cost of activities used in producing them

LO 2, AC 2.1

Trust is the expectation that the other party will behave in a predictable and mutually acceptable way. In inter-firm relationships, the presence and absence of trust can affect the level of cost in a relationship. The existence of trust is taught to lower the transaction cost in a relationship. Dr. Mari Sako identified taxonomy of 3 types of trust in commercial relationship, which is very useful from the perspective of procurement.

Contractual trust: Trust based on the contract with TOP. This is potentially the weakest source of trust if there is nothing else to base the trust on, but it is the quickest to establish.

Competence trust: Trust based on TOP's professional qualifications or proven or certified technical capability or experience.

Goodwill trust: Trust based on knowing TOP has your interest at heart and will not behave opportunistically. This is potentially the strongest type of trust, but it takes the longest time to build.

Otherwise, trust also has legal meaning. A trust is a legal document that can be created during a person's lifetime and survive the person's death. A trust can also be created by a will and formed after death. Charitable trusts are trusts which benefit a particular charity or the public in general.

There are 5 key phases of negotiation:

The opening phase: confirm understanding and get the issue on the table

The testing phase: check assumption and confirm understanding

The proposing phase: asking 'if'

The bargaining phase: using tradeables

The agreement and closing phase

The testing could take the form of questions following a presentation by either side or questions on a tender or proposal document received by the buyer from the potential supplier. The testing phase is necessary to confirm that your approach and objectives are appropriate for the negotiation situation you now find yourself in. Careful listening, observation and interpretation of TOP's responses may give indication of the following:

Areas where TOP is willing and unwilling to make concessions

What factors or issues TOP places a high value on

If there are any non-commercial or emotional factors that may be pertinent

TOP's underlying interests - why they are taking the position they are.

With non-critical commodity products, the relationship will be transactional. Buyer should not spend too much time and effort into the negotiation.

LO 1, AC 1.4

“Expanding the pie” is a strategy used in integrative negotiations where both parties collaborate to increase the total value available before dividing it. This leads to mutual gains and supports long-term, strategic relationships.

Microeconomic factors refer to elements that affect individual businesses or sectors rather than the economy as a whole. In this case:

Availability of investors (B): Access to investors impacts capital availability for businesses.

Distribution channels (D): Distribution methods directly influence a business’s ability to get products to market.

Levels of competition (F): Competition affects pricing and strategic decisions within specific industries.

Taxation rates, unemployment levels, and inflation rates are considered macroeconomic factors, affecting the economy on a broader scale, as per CIPS's definitions of microeconomic vs. macroeconomic influences.

In some markets, suppliers experience peaks and troughs in demand and so buyers can increase their leverage through developing an understanding of how busy their vendor are at particular time during the year or business cycle and targetting at quieter period. Similarly, if a buyer can develop an understanding of supplier capacity and to what extent have they covered their fixed cost, they may be able to target suppliers when their average costs are likely to be lowest. Vendor's average costs will be higher at low and high capacity utilisation.

A picture containing graphical user interface Description automatically generated

In the context of aninternal IT project, the relevant stakeholders would be thosedirectly involved in decision-making and implementation.Senior managementoversees funding and strategic fit, whilesoftware developersensure technical support. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external and not primary stakeholders in this scenario.

“Stakeholder identification must focus on individuals or groups directly involved or affected by the procurement. This includes internal sponsors, end-users, and technical staff responsible for delivery.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Internal and External Stakeholders)

In order to estimate the gap and the progress towards desired level of support, a stakeholder support scale can be used by the procurement internally. The support level scale measures stakeholder commitment. Current support level for the procurement/negotiation objectives should be gained from engagement with key stakeholders. The following is an example of stakeholder support level scale:

LO 1, AC 1.1

Procurement can negotiate various aspects of a purchase requisition even without a formal value analysis. While value analysis can enhance cost-effectiveness, procurement professionals often negotiate on pricing, terms, and conditions to add value independently of value analysis, as per CIPS’s guidelines on procurement flexibility in negotiations.

While understanding the supply market and preparing aBATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)are essential, theydo not cover all risks. Comprehensive preparation includes defining thenegotiation team, setting clearobjectives, planningtradeables, and anticipatingcommunication tactics. Skipping these steps can lead to poor coordination, misunderstandings, and missed opportunities. Effective negotiation is amultifaceted process, not a single strategy.

Professor Gavin Kennedy highlights that we need to distinguish negotiation from other forms of decision-making by focusing on what is unique about it (the voluntary exchange) and not shared by other

techniques such as persuasion, gambling (e.g., coin tossing), command decision, instruction, litigation and coercion.

Hypothetical (“What if…”) questions test possibilities and invite creative options without binding either side. They help probe interests and packages while keeping commitment provisional.

A monopoly exists when only one company can supply an essential product or service in a given region because of significant barriers to entry for any competitor. The barriers can be legal, regulatory, economic, or geographic. Ma Bell case is an example of monopoly. The company was broken up in 1982.

A monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers.

Pure or perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which the following criteria are met:

- All firms sell an identical product (the product is a "commodity" or "homogeneous").

- All firms are price takers (they cannot influence the market price of their product).

- Market share has no influence on prices.

- Buyers have complete or "perfect" information—in the past, present and future—about the product being sold and the prices charged by each firm.

- Resources for such a labor are perfectly mobile.

- Firms can enter or exit the market without cost.

Monopolistic competition characterizes an industry in which many firms offer products or services that are similar, but not perfect substitutes. Barriers to entry and exit in a monopolistic competitive industry are low, and the decisions of any one firm do not directly affect those of its competitors. Monopolistic competition is closely related to the business strategy of brand differentiation

Hearing is passive but listening is active, and some people need to learn to be a good, attentive listener. The following rules of attentive listening will help you to become a successful negotiator:

• Be motivated to listen

• Be alert to non-verbal cues

• Do not interrupt the other party when they are speaking

• Fight off distractions

• Write everything down

• Listen with a goal in mind

• Give the other party your undivided attention

• React to the message, not the person

LO 3, AC 3.3

Late paymentsdamage trust and strain supplier cash flow, becoming a direct source of conflict. Similarly, when gains, risks, or costs arenot equitably shared, perceptions of unfairness can destabilize the relationship.

“Persistent late payments not only threaten supplier cash flows but can significantly erode trust. Additionally, disproportionate sharing of risks or benefits can create resentment and hinder collaboration.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.3 - Causes and Management of Conflict in Procurement)

The pull approach relies on persuasion, interpersonal influence, and aligning proposals with others’ goals to secure commitment. It is not about forcing compliance (that is push). By engaging influencers and presenting a vision they can adopt, pull fosters buy-in and voluntary agreement. This method is particularly effective in collaborative negotiations where relationships and long-term trust are important.

Fixed-price agreements give buyers financial certainty, reducing exposure to supplier inefficiencies, cost increases, or inflation. The supplier bears the risk of cost overruns. While it doesn’t automatically improve quality or payment terms, it allows buyers to forecast budgets and manage risk effectively. This makes fixed-price contracts especially useful for projects with defined scopes, where costs are predictable. In contrast, cost-plus contracts keep the risk with the buyer and require constant monitoring of supplier costs, making them less attractive in terms of risk management.

Coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish other for non-compliance, and can be considered as the flip side of reward power. Coercive power rests in the individual's ability to change other people's behaviour through threat, intimidation, use of guilt, ability to embarrass or shame, or withdrawal of benefits,...

Building rapport sets apositive tonefor the negotiation and encourages openness. It is particularly vital during theopening phase, where first impressions are formed, and trust begins to build. Trust facilitates moreconstructive dialogue, enhances collaboration, and helps parties exploremutual interests.

“Developing rapport at the start of negotiations helps to foster trust and cooperation. This enhances the likelihood of reaching agreements that are mutually beneficial.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.4 - The Opening Phase and Relationship Building)

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

Text Description automatically generated

Using logical and objective reasons is one of the typical characteristics of persuasion reasoning method.

Using threats is generally inappropriate in strategic supplier negotiations where a long-term, trust-based relationship is required (C). Threatening tactics can damage the relationship and may result in resistance from the supplier. CIPS advocates for collaborative approaches in strategic relationships to foster mutual trust and achieve sustainable agreements.

Negotiations do not end at the meeting; they continue through reflection, documentation, and post-negotiation review. Best practice involves assessing whether objectives were met, capturing lessons learned, and ensuring written confirmation of terms. Without this, misunderstandings or missed improvements can occur. Reflection allows organisations to continuously strengthen negotiation strategies and build learning cycles.

A collaborative negotiation approach is explicitly designed to achieve win–win outcomes, where both parties work together to maximise joint value. This approach is closely associated with integrative negotiation, emphasising trust, information sharing, and joint problem-solving. Distributive and adversarial approaches are win–lose, focusing on dividing value rather than creating it. “Collective” is not a recognised CIPS negotiation approach. Collaborative negotiation is particularly suitable where long-term relationships, shared objectives, or strategic partnerships are important.

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

- Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

- Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

- One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases buyer's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

- JCB's switching costs are low: Buyer may easily switch its suppliers anytime

- These components are highly standardised: The products are not different any more, buyer may choose to buy from any supplier available.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

- Suppliers are more concentrated than buyer: Suppliers are forming oligopoly market, their bargaining power tend to be greater.

- Eruption of epidemic in supply market: this is a macro factor. Eruption of epidemic may cause factories closed and disruptions on supply chain.

- Buyers purchase in small volumes: Buyer will be seen as less potential to suppliers. Buying organisation may have difficulties to deal better price with suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.3

There are multiple sources of divergent positions that can arise in situations where money is exchange for goods and services. There are 2 different types of sources. Those that arise from the content or subject matter of the negotiation (what is being negotiated) and those that arise from the process of negotiation (how it is being negotiated).

Sources of divergent positions - the process of negotiation:

Table Description automatically generated

Line of best fits is the line that goes approximately through the middle of the data points with an equal number of data points above and below it. Line of best fits is a method of calculating medium value in statistics.

Standard terms and conditions are basic terms and conditions of business governing transactions that do not have a definitive contract, usually designed to be included in form documents such as orders. While there may be conflicts regarding standard terms and conditions, they are about the content of negotiation, not the process.

Type of purchase: when buying organisation makes an decision to purchase an item, a buyer is faced with three possible scenarios. The item to be bought could be a straight re-buy, a modified re-buy or a new purchase. Decision on type of purchase is purely an internal decision.

Macroeconomic indicators are statistics or data readings that reflect the economic circumstances of a particular country, region or sector. They are used by analysts and governments to assess the current and future health of the economy and financial markets.

Macroeconomic indicators will vary in their meaning and the impact that they have on the economy, but broadly speaking there are two main types of indicator.

- Leading indicators, which forecast where an economy might be heading. They are often used by governments to implement policies because they represent the first phase of a new economic cycle. These include the yield curve, interest rates and share prices.

- Lagging indicators, which reflect an economy’s historical performance and only change after a trend has been established. They are used to confirm a trend is underway. These include gross domestic product (GDP), inflation and employment figures.

There is also the category of coincident indicators, but these are generally grouped in with lagging indicators as they either happen at the same time or after an economic shift.

The best macroeconomic indicator to watch will heavily depend on your personal preferences, what positions you are taking and which country your portfolio is focused on. However, there are some very common indicators that most traders and investors will keep an eye on.

For simplicity’s sake, we have split these out into leading and lagging indicators.

Top leading indicators:

1. The stock market

2. House prices

3. Bond yields

4. Production and manufacturing statistics

5. Retail sales

6. Interest rates

Top lagging indicators:

1. GDP growth rates

2. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and inflation

3. Currency strength and stability

4. Labour market statistics

5. Commodity prices

A procurement professional may find stock market data from the security exchange, while most lagging indicators (such as GDP, CPI, unemployment rate, currency and inflation rate, etc) can be found from government statistics data.

While compromise seems fair, it often erodes credibility and weakens long-term negotiation outcomes. Skilled negotiators avoid “splitting the difference” automatically, since it signals weak preparation and can encourage exploitation in future talks. Instead, agreements should be built on objective value, data, and tradeables. Compromise has a place, but reliance on it damages strategic positioning. CIPS stresses integrative or principled negotiation over simplistic middle-ground settlements.

When preparing for a negotiation, negotiator should establish a list of tradeables and a concession plan. Good negotiators never give anything away that has not already been planned as part of the bargaining mix in the concession planning stage.

In the above scenario, the procurement manager has planned his own concession, so he can trade with supplier. The answer should be "Yes, since procurement manager has his own cost savings target to achieve and he should make use of supplier's financial status"

LO 2, AC 2.3

Ray Carter coined the mnemonic STOPS WASTE to remind buyers of 10 cost-reduction ideas they can ask for themselves and their suppliers in any situation when considering a key purchase input. Stop Waste by:

Standardisation - is there a standard specification?

Transportation - is the inbound transport classification appropriate

Over-engineered - is the specification too tight?

Packaging - can packaging be reduced or eliminated?

Substitutes - is there a cheaper substitute material

Weight - is there opportunity to reduce weight of the product?

Any unnecessary processing - is there any unnecessary design or feature?

Supplier’s input - are suppliers able to assist with the cost reduction

To make - is it more economical to make or buy?

Eliminate - if no one uses the feature, can it be eliminated?

SAMOA is a useful acronym for checking and testing the information gathered from the Internet:

Source

Audience

Methodology

Objectivity

Accuracy

OWN-IT is acronym for 5 steps in the process of collecting and analysing the data and information needed in any field:

Outline

Wide search

Narrow search

Increase your stockpile of information

Transform your stockpile into new knowledge

A SMART goal is used to help guide goal setting. SMART is an acronym that stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound.

Buyer power gives customers/consumers (buyers) the ability to squeeze industry margins by pressuring firms (the suppliers) to reduce prices or increase the quality of services or products offered.

There are four major factors to consider when determining the bargaining power of buyers:

1. Number of buyers relative to suppliers: If the number of buyers is small relative to that of suppliers, the buyer’s power will be stronger.

2. Dependence of a buyer’s purchase on a particular supplier: If a buyer is able to get similar products/services from other suppliers, buyers depend less on a particular supplier. Therefore, the power of the buyer would be greater.

3. Switching costs: If there are not many alternative suppliers available, the cost of switching is high. Therefore, buyer power would be low.

4. Backward Integration: If the buyer is able to integrate or merge suppliers, the buyer has greater bargaining power over the existing suppliers.

When is Bargaining Power of Buyers High/Strong?

There are fewer buyers relative to that of suppliers

The switching costs of the buyer are low

If the buyer is able to backward integrate

The buyer purchases product in bulk (high volume)

The buyer is able to get similar product/services from other suppliers

The buyer purchases the majority of the seller’s products

Several substitutes are available on the market

Product is not differentiated

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are 5 options in this question:

'Threat of punishment, costs and damage': The influencer tries to 'push' the other party to act as he/she wants by using force. This method is effective but short-lived. The influencer also risks to developing reputation for being heavy handed and dictatorial.

'Argument based on information, logic and reason': The influencer uses logic and reasons to persuade the other party. This is also known as 'Persuasive Reasoning' (Push)

'Using language and imagery to ‘paint a picture others can see’': The influencer seeks to influence another by understanding the other's emotions, and stimulating that party's imagination to visualise the desired future goal of the influencer. This is also known as 'visionary (pull)'

'Working together to define the problem, the goals and the best solution': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another involves the other party in the decision making process. This is known as 'collaborative (pull)'

'Listening to, involving and supporting others': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another tries to discover the other party's emotion and aims at mutual understanding. This is also a collaborative approach.

When a buyer’s purchase represents asignificant portion of a supplier’s revenue, it increases the buyer’s leverage. The supplier has a vested interest in maintaining the relationship and is more likely to make concessions to preserve the account.

“Buyer power increases when the buyer represents a large portion of the supplier's total sales. This dependency increases the buyer’s ability to influence terms.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Bargaining Power Analysis)

By removing the requirement for named personnel, CDL could allow the supplier flexibility in allocating equally competent but possibly less expensive staff. This tradeable does not compromise on quality but helps control costs.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation.

LO 1, AC 1.1

A probing question seeks deeper information, clarifying specifics beyond surface-level responses. Lina’s question is factual, detailed, and investigative — designed to uncover processes and commitments. Hypothetical questions test options (“what if…”), reflective restate or summarise to confirm understanding, and leading steer the respondent toward a desired answer. Probing is essential in negotiations to validate claims, identify risks, and build persuasive arguments.

The testing stage of the negotiation cycle is where each party explores and validates information provided by the other side. By asking the supplier to present their performance to date, Ben is testing claims, checking credibility, and assessing whether the supplier’s performance supports or undermines their position in the negotiation. This is distinct from preparation (which happens before the meeting), bargaining (where concessions and tradeables are exchanged), and agreement (where final terms are confirmed). CIPS highlights that testing allows negotiators to challenge assumptions, clarify evidence, and strengthen their position before moving into bargaining or closure.

Direct costs are attributable to a specific project — in construction, this includes materials and on-site labour. Legal fees, insurance, and office space are indirect costs, as they support the business overall but are not tied to one project. For buyers, distinguishing direct from indirect costs ensures pricing transparency and helps challenge excessive overhead allocations. This knowledge strengthens cost breakdown negotiations in project contracts.

External factors in pricing decisions include Competition in the market (A) and Customer perception of value (D). These factors are outside the supplier's direct control but influence pricing strategies to remain competitive and meet customer expectations:

Competition in the market (A): Market competition dictates how much a supplier can charge without losing business to competitors.

Customer perception of value (D): How customers perceive the product’s worth affects its acceptable price range.

These factors are considered external as they relate to market dynamics rather than internal cost structures, according to CIPS's guidance on pricing influences.

The broken record tactic involves repeating the same point to reinforce a position, making it difficult for the other party to ignore. Here, the buyer keeps citing budget constraints to avoid moving away from their position, hoping repetition will wear down the supplier’s resistance. This tactic is common in distributive bargaining and aims to anchor discussions around a fixed limitation. While effective, overuse risks damaging relationships, so skilled negotiators balance it with genuine reasoning and integrative approaches when appropriate.

According to Thomas-Kilmann conflict model instrument, there are 5 conflict management styles:

In this scenario, the buyer's bargaining power is stronger than suppliers', and the relationship is transactional. Therefore, to get the most preferable outcome, the procurement professional can take an assertive approach, while he doesn't need to co-operate closely with these suppliers. Competing will be the most appropriate approach to negotiation in this scenario so that the buying organisation can get a better deal.

Published market indices are a source of macroeconomic data, as they reflect broader economic trends and provide insights into the overall market environment, which is essential for globalexpansion planning. Macroeconomic analysis focuses on high-level economic indicators, as recommended in CIPS’s guidelines on sourcing macroeconomic data.

According to the book 'Influencing: Skills and techniques for business success' by Fiona Dent and Mike Brent, there are two major influencing styles. Push tends to be directive. It tells, and is clear and resolute, but needs to be employed in situations where firmness is required because of difficulties that exist or weakness is evident. Pull is more participatory and collaborative. It seeks to incorporate everyone’s perspective. It can appear wishy-washy if not skilfully employed. Thatapproach should be followed which is most likely to secure commitment and not mere compliance.

The two divisions can be further divided into four style categories: directive; persuasive reasoning; collaborative – team oriented, people oriented to inspire them with a vision. The directive style relies on your expertise and reputation being respected by others, and where there really does seem to be one answer. It is "I" driven whereas persuasive reasoning is more "we" and issue driven. Directive styles can make the user appear as "a bull in a china shop"; persuasive reasoning can be portrayed as tough guy.

Collaborative influencing takes the "we" element further and seeks to mobilise everyone’s ideas in a journey of discovery. It may have the flavour of "I’m your best friend", which may not go down too well. Visioning style is concerned to stir people’s emotions in support of achieving an objective. This last one has been used by demagogues to stir people’s hearts and minds for evil purposes as well as good.

A useful table offers the benefits, problems, words and body language associated with each style along with advice on when to use and when to avoid each. Cases and exercises illustrate these styles.

Empathy comes in for extended treatment with the definition of "standing in the other's shoes". This does not necessarily happen just intuitively, and therefore before a specific influencing effort there should be an intense effort to think about the other person or persons and to sense what it might feel like to be them – their hopes, fears, concerns, what turns them on, what turns them off, where are they coming from.

Essentially, for trained negotiators under most circumstances, the physical locations of negotiations and the room layout should not make much difference to the outcomes of the meeting. It is reasonable to assume that most commercial negotiations are based at least initially on a principled- or pragmatic-type approach. It is arguable also that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

A business negotiation agenda is a formal agreed upon list of goals to be achieved or items to be discussed in a particular order during a meeting or negotiation. Agendas can be formal and obvious, or informal and subtle in negotiations.

The agenda is one of the main structural elements of negotiation, in addition to such questions as site, identification of participants, and elements of timing. Together, they answer the who, what, when, and where questions. As with other aspects of negotiation, the agenda can be used either manipulatively to enhance leverage or to improve the prospects for agreement and the possibilities for mutual gain. In most cases, it will be used both ways, reflecting the nature of negotiation as a “mixed-motive” situation.

Although it can be instrumental to [research] volunteer as a sole source to write the agenda, in most cases it becomes a joint activity to construct a consensual basis for subsequent negotiation. In these situations, agenda-building becomes one of the pre-negotiation activities that set the tone for the relationship (Saunders, 1985). In other situations, the parties may engage in actual negotiation without a formal or written agenda. When this occurs, the risks and uncertainties may be high but the party who appreciates the importance of the informal agenda has a tremendous advantage.

Whether one plans it or not, during the course of negotiation the parties will discuss a finite set of issues in some sequence and from a particular perceptual framework. Consciousness of the universality and centrality of the agenda is prerequisite to guiding negotiation to a successful conclusion.

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of dealer style are described below:

LO 2, AC 2.4

Involving an appropriate cross-functional team is beneficial for effective commercial negotiation because it brings together diverse perspectives and expertise relevant to the negotiation context. According to CIPS, a cross-functional team ensures that all aspects, such as technical, financial, and operational inputs, are considered, leading to more balanced and informed decision-making. This approach also helps in addressing complex negotiation elements effectively.

Connected stakeholders are those who, by contractual or commercial relationships, have a significant stake in organisation activity. As a general rule, connected stakeholder (with the exception of suppliers) have a low level of influence on procurement negotiations.

Examples of connected stakeholders are: suppliers, customers, bank where the organisation opens its account, shareholders.

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

Partnership relationshipsare strategic and long-term. They emphasizetrust, collaboration, and information sharing. Unlike transactional relationships, they go beyond price and delivery to focus on joint value creation.

“Collaborative partnerships involve open information sharing and mutual support. These relationships are built on joint objectives, trust, and commitment to long-term success.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.2 - Types of Supplier Relationships)

Accepting gifts during a negotiation can createconflict of interestconcerns and may violate ethical standards. Best practice requires rejecting such offers to maintain transparency and objectivity in decision-making.

In difficult negotiations and disputes, hardball tactics like punishment and threats often seem like the only way to win concessions. Some negotiators seem to believe that hardball tactics are the key to success in any negotiation. They resort to extreme demands and even unethical behaviour to try to get the upper hand in a negotiation.

The following are 8 typical hardball tactics:

1. Good cop / Bad cop

2. Low ball / High ball

3. Bogey

4. The Nibble

5. Chicken

6. Intimidation

7. Aggressive Behaviour

8. Snow Job

You can read the details of each tactic here.

In the contrary to hardball tactics, negotiators can adopt integrative approach to the negotiation. Some of integrative tactics are:

1. Expand the Pie

2. Bridging

3. Post Settlement –Settlement

Et cetera

An adversarial negotiation style is more suitable in a market with many alternative sources and substitutes (B). When there are multiple suppliers, buyers have the upper hand and can adopt a competitive stance without risking supply continuity. This aligns with CIPS guidance on the use of adversarial styles in competitive markets with numerous alternatives.

Absorption costing allocates indirect overheads to units, which is inherently judgemental; selecting allocation bases that “fairly” load overhead to products is the well-known difficulty. (By contrast, option B describes activity-based costing concepts—cost pools and drivers.)

For a private healthcare IT project, Senior Management (strategic decision-makers) and Software support developers (technical implementers) are the primary stakeholders. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external parties not directly affected by the IT project outcomes. Identifying true stakeholders ensures effective engagement, reduces resistance, and aligns negotiation priorities with those who influence or are impacted by the decision. Misidentifying stakeholders risks ignoring critical voices, undermining project success and negotiation alignment.

Mark-up % = Profit ÷ Cost × 100. Here, profit is $80, cost is $160. So, (80 ÷ 160) × 100 = 50%. This differs from margin, which is profit ÷ selling price. Mark-up analysis helps buyers understand supplier pricing structures, detect hidden margins, and strengthen negotiation. By knowing whether a supplier is working with high or low mark-up levels, buyers can challenge prices more effectively or justify alternative offers. This analytical preparation supports objective negotiation rather than reliance on supplier claims.

Listening involves both hearing (1) and interpreting (2) the information shared by the other party. Effective listening is an active process that goes beyond simply hearing words; it involvesinterpreting meaning, understanding the speaker’s intent, and responding accordingly. CIPS emphasizes these steps as part of effective communication in negotiations.

SMART is an acronym that you can use to guide your goal setting. SMART is an acronym that stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound

A student met this question in the L4M5 exam. SMART is mentioned primarily in L4M3 Commercial Contracting.

LO: Unknown, AC: Unknown

If driving greater value and efficiency from your supply base is your end, you should remember that there are many ways to do this without seeking to negotiate lower prices. Below are 7 types of saving levers:

Trust develops when organisations consistently deliver on commitments—meeting deadlines, respecting terms, and fulfilling promises. While audits, contract management, and data gathering support oversight, they do not in themselves build trust. In collaborative negotiations, reliability becomes the foundation of long-term partnerships, reducing the need for constant monitoring. CIPS highlights that trust is fragile and must be reinforced through transparency, consistent behaviour, and alignment of actions with words. This credibility is more persuasive than any formal monitoring.

Mark-up is defined as profit expressed as a percentage of the cost. It calculates the profit margin based on the cost price rather than the selling price, which allows companies to determine how much they are earning over their production or purchase costs. This aligns with standard accounting and CIPS definitions of mark-up in procurement contexts.

In integrative (win–win) negotiations, power is not used to dominate or coerce but to enable progress and overcome barriers. Power can help move negotiations forward when discussions stall on specific issues and can help address behavioural or attitudinal barriers that prevent collaboration. Maximising one side’s share of gains and coercion are characteristics of distributive or adversarial negotiations, not integrative ones. CIPS clearly differentiates the constructive use of power in integrative negotiations as a means to facilitate dialogue, encourage engagement, and unlock joint value, rather than to force submission or extract disproportionate gains.

Negotiation variables such as price or contract length, etc are that can be traded with TOP in a negotiation. The more variables you can identify, the better. The more variables you can identify and articulate, the lower the chances of the negotiation reaching deadlock as more possibilities are facilitated regarding more creative solutions.

Below are examples of negotiation tradeables in buying professional services:

LO 2, AC 2.3

The zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) or bargaining range is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

The zone of proximal development refers to the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner.

There is no Walk away area. Walk away point is a position from which you cannot concede any more ground and must walk away/decline a deal.

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement is a fallback or backstop position if the negotiation fails to result in an agreement/no deal is agreed.

LO 1, AC 1.2