NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Fortinet NSE 4 - FortiOS 7.6 Administrator Questions and Answers

From the HA configuration shown for HQ-NGFW-1:

set memory-based-failover enable

set memory-failover-threshold 70

set memory-failover-monitor-period 50

set memory-failover-sample-rate 10

set memory-failover-flip-timeout 60

set override disable

set priority 200

From the performance status outputs:

HQ-NGFW-1 memory used is 90% (well above the configured threshold of 70%)

HQ-NGFW-2 memory used is about 48.7% (well below the threshold)

What happens in FortiOS 7.6 with memory-based failover

When memory-based failover is enabled, FortiGate monitors memory utilization. If the unit’s memory usage stays above the configured memory-failover-threshold for the configured memory-failover-monitor-period, the cluster triggers a failover away from the unit under memory pressure.

Threshold = 70%

HQ-NGFW-1 is at 90%, so it violates the threshold.

Monitor period = 50 seconds.

The administrator observed for 55 seconds, which is longer than 50 seconds, so the condition is met for long enough to trigger failover.

The memory-failover-flip-timeout 60 is used to prevent rapid back-and-forth role changes (flapping) after a failover decision; it does not prevent the initial failover from occurring once the threshold breach persists for the monitor period.

In FortiOS 7.6, if an administrator wants to block traffic only after an IPS signature is triggered a specific number of times within a defined time window, this must be done using IPS filters with rate-based settings.

Why option D is correct

IPS filters allow administrators to match signatures based on attributes such as:

Severity

Protocol

CVE

Signature ID

IPS filters support rate-based actions using:

rate-mode periodical

rate-count

rate-duration

With rate-mode periodical, FortiGate:

Counts how many times a signature is triggered

Within a defined time period

And applies the configured action (for example, block) once the threshold is exceeded

This directly matches the requirement:

“block traffic that triggers the signature set number of times during a specific time period.”

Why the other options are incorrect

A. IPS group signatures, set rate-mode 60Group signatures do not provide the required per-period rate-based blocking logic.

B. IPS packet logging optionLogging does not enforce blocking behavior.

C. IPS signatures, rate-mode periodical optionRate-based controls are applied via IPS filters, not directly on individual signature definitions.

In FortiOS 7.6, the predefined deep-inspection and custom-deep-inspection SSL inspection profiles intentionally exclude certain web categories (such as Finance and Banking and Health and Wellness) and well-known domains (for example, Apple, Google, Adobe). This behavior is documented and intentional.

The two correct reasons are:

B. The legal regulation aims to prioritize user privacy and protect sensitive information for these websites.

Correct

Categories like Finance and Banking and Health and Wellness commonly handle highly sensitive personal data.

Many privacy and compliance regulations (for example, GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA-like requirements) discourage or restrict SSL interception for such traffic.

To reduce legal and compliance risks, FortiOS exempts these categories from deep SSL inspection by default.

This is explicitly stated in FortiOS SSL/SSH Inspection documentation.

C. These websites are in an allowlist of reputable domain names maintained by FortiGuard.

Correct

FortiGuard maintains a reputable/trusted domain list for well-known services and platforms.

These domains are excluded from deep inspection by default to:

Prevent application breakage

Avoid certificate pinning and compatibility issues

Maintain user experience

This is why domains such as Apple, Google, Adobe, and app stores appear under SSL inspection exemptions.

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Resource utilization optimization

Incorrect.

While reduced inspection can save resources, this is not the primary documented reason for exempting these categories.

D. FortiGate temporary certificate denies access to HSTS websites

Incorrect.

Although HSTS and certificate pinning can cause issues with SSL inspection, this option describes a side effect, not the reason for exemption.

The exemption exists to avoid such problems, not because the certificate denies access.

In FortiOS 7.6, GUI session inactivity timeout behavior for administrators is controlled by admin profiles, not by general access permissions or profile ordering.

How GUI idle timeout works in FortiOS 7.6

FortiGate has a global admin timeout (admintimeout), but

Admin profiles can override this value using the Override idle timeout setting.

When Override idle timeout is enabled in an admin profile, the timeout value defined inside that profile takes precedence over the global setting.

The exhibit shows that the NOC team logs in using the NOC_Access admin profile. Therefore, to prevent their GUI sessions from disconnecting too quickly during inactivity, the timeout must be adjusted within that specific admin profile.

Why option B is correct

B. Increase the value of the Override Idle Timeout parameter in the NOC_Access admin profile.

This directly controls how long GUI sessions remain active when users assigned to NOC_Access are idle.

It affects only the NOC team, which matches the requirement precisely.

This is the recommended and documented approach in FortiOS 7.6.

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Increase admintimeout under config system accprofileIncorrect. admintimeout is a global admin setting, not configured under accprofile, and it would affect all administrators, not just NOC users.

C. Move NOC_Access to the top of the listIncorrect. Admin profile order has no impact on session timeout behavior.

D. Assign super_admin roleIncorrect and insecure. Super_admin does not control idle timeout and would unnecessarily grant full privileges.

According to the FortiOS 7.6 Administrator Guide and the specific behavior of the SD-WAN GUI, here is the technical breakdown:

SD-WAN Zone Hierarchy and UI Elements: In the FortiGate GUI, SD-WAN zones that contain member interfaces are displayed with a plus (+) icon next to the checkbox. This icon allows administrators to expand the zone and view the specific physical or logical interfaces assigned to it.

Analysis of the "Underlay" Zone: In the provided exhibit, the virtual-wan-link and overlay zones both feature the plus (+) expansion icon, indicating they have active members. The Underlay zone, however, lacks this icon and displays a red status icon. This is the visual indicator in FortiOS that the zone is currently empty and contains no member interfaces.

Mandatory Zone Membership: In FortiOS 7.x, every SD-WAN member interface must be assigned to a zone. It is not possible for an interface to be an "SD-WAN member" (as shown in the legend with port2 and port3) without being assigned to a zone. Since port2 and port3 are listed in the legend, they are indeed assigned to one of the other expanded zones (likely virtual-wan-link or overlay), making Option D incorrect.

Default Zone Behavior: While FortiOS 7.6 often creates default zones like virtual-wan-link, underlay, and overlay during certain configuration wizards or by default in newer versions, they are distinct entities. There is no single "default" zone that acts as a global catch-all in the way Option C suggests.

Immutability of System Zones: While certain system-defined zones have restrictions, the primary focus of this specific exhibit is the current membership state, which clearly shows the Underlay zone is empty.

In FortiSASE site-based (remote internet access) deployments, FortiExtender is used to onboard branch or remote sites without a local FortiGate.

According to FortiSASE and FortiExtender architecture documentation:

FortiExtender integrates with FortiSASE using a secure VXLAN-over-IPsec tunnel

This tunnel:

Extends the site network to FortiSASE

Transparently forwards traffic for inspection

Preserves network segmentation and routing context

This design is similar to cloud-based LAN extension and is not proxy-based

Why the other options are incorrect

B: FortiClient is used for agent-based user access, not FortiExtender

C: Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is a service, not a transport mechanism

D: PAC files and explicit proxies are used in agentless / proxy-based access, not site-based FortiExtender deployments

"Also, advanced mode supports nested or inherited groups; that is, users can be members of subgroups that belong to monitored parent groups." "In advanced mode, you can configure FortiGate as an LDAP client and configure the group filters on FortiGate. You can also configure group filters on the collector agent."

Collector Agent Advanced Mode provides deeper integration between FortiGate, LDAP, and Active Directory, compared to standard mode.

Key features of Collector Agent Advanced Mode

B. FortiGate can be configured as an LDAP client and group filters can be configured on FortiGate.

Correct

In advanced mode:

FortiGate directly queries LDAP/AD

User group filters are configured on FortiGate, not only on the Collector Agent

This allows more flexible and scalable user/group-based policies

D. Advanced mode supports nested or inherited groups.

Correct

Advanced mode supports:

Nested AD groups

Inherited group memberships

This is one of the primary reasons advanced mode is used in complex AD environments

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Security profiles only to user groups

Incorrect.

Security profiles can be applied to users or groups, depending on policy configuration.

C. Uses NetBIOS Domain\Username format

Incorrect.

NetBIOS naming is associated with standard mode

Advanced mode typically uses LDAP DN-based identification

From the exhibits, there are three relevant firewall policies from LAN (port4) to WAN (port2), each using a different IP pool for source NAT:

TCP traffic

Service: ALL_TCP

Destination: BR1-FGT

IP Pool: SNAT-Pool → 100.65.0.49

PING traffic

Service: PING

Destination: all

IP Pool: SNAT-Remote1 → 100.65.0.99

IGMP traffic

Service: IGMP

Destination: all

IP Pool: SNAT-Remote → 100.65.0.149

The user on HQ-PC-1 (10.0.11.50) is pinging BR1-FGT (100.65.1.111). In FortiOS, policy matching is based on (among other fields) source, destination, and service, and the first matching policy in top-down order is applied.

Because the traffic is ICMP echo (ping), it matches the policy named PING traffic (service PING, destination all). That policy explicitly uses Use Dynamic IP Pool with SNAT-Remote1, which is configured with external IP 100.65.0.99.

Therefore, the source NAT IP used for this ping is 100.65.0.99.

In FortiOS 7.6 Application Control, security logs are generated primarily for actions such as Block or Monitor, not for Allow actions.

What is happening in the exhibit

An Application Override is configured for ABC.Com

Type: Application

Action: Allow

The application control profile is applied to a firewall policy

Logging is enabled on the firewall policy

Traffic to ABC.Com is successfully allowed

However, no security logs appear for ABC.Com.

Why no logs are generated

In FortiOS 7.6:

Application Control logs are written to Security Logs when:

An application is Blocked

An application is Monitored

When an application action is set to Allow:

The traffic is permitted silently

No application control security log is generated

Even if policy logging is enabled

This is expected and documented behavior.

To generate logs for allowed applications, the action must be set to Monitor, not Allow.

Why the other options are incorrect

A. ABC.Com is hitting the category Excessive-BandwidthIncorrect. ABC.Com has a higher-priority explicit override (priority 1), so it is not evaluated against the Excessive-Bandwidth filter.

B. The ABC.Com Type is set as Application instead of FilterIncorrect. Application-type overrides are valid and commonly used; this does not suppress logging.

C. The ABC.Com must be configured as a web filter profileIncorrect. This traffic is being evaluated by Application Control, not Web Filter.

The exhibit shows the output of the following command:

diagnose test application ipsmonitor 1

pid = 2044, engine count = 0 (+1)

0 - pid:2074:2074 cfg:1 master:0 run:1

How to interpret this output (FortiOS 7.6 – IPS internals)

ipsmonitor displays the status of IPS engines running on the FortiGate.

engine count = 0 means:

No IPS scanning engines are currently active

IPS is not processing any traffic

In FortiOS, IPS engines are started on demand.

Critical documented behavior

IPS processes are only spawned when at least one firewall policy is configured with an IPS profile and traffic matches that policy.

If no firewall policy references an IPS profile, the IPS engine:

Does not start

Shows engine count = 0

Appears “not working,” even though the IPS profile exists

This is exactly what the diagnose output indicates.

Why option A is correct

A. There is no firewall policy configured with an IPS security profile.

Creating an IPS profile alone is not sufficient

IPS must be applied to an active firewall policy

Traffic must match that policy for the IPS engine to run

Otherwise, ipsmonitor will show engine count = 0

This matches FortiOS 7.6 IPS operational behavior.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5.

Incorrect.

The exhibit clearly shows ipsmonitor 1

Using a different argument would not explain engine count = 0

C. FortiGate entered into IPS fail open state.

Incorrect.

In fail-open, IPS engines may be bypassed, but they still initialize

engine count = 0 specifically indicates IPS is not in use at all

D. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 99.

Incorrect.

The command argument affects debug level, not engine creation

Again, the exhibit shows ipsmonitor 1