PMI-PBA PMI Professional in Business Analysis Questions and Answers

 Interviewing is a technique to elicit information, opinions, or feedback from stakeholders by asking them questions and listening to their responses. Interviewing can be used to clarify or validate requirements, resolve conflicts or misunderstandings, build rapport and trust, and explore complex or sensitive issues. A good time to consider using the interviewing method is when there are communication challenges among stakeholders, such as different perspectives, expectations, or interests. Interviewing can help to overcome these challenges by providing a direct and personal communication channel, allowing the interviewer to tailor the questions and responses to each stakeholder, and facilitating a deeper understanding of the stakeholder’s needs and concerns. The other options are not good times to consider using the interviewing method. Attempting to obtain sign-off on requirements from stakeholders is not an elicitation activity, but a validation activity that requires formal documentation and approval. There is not enough time to gather requirements from many different sources is a constraint that limits the use of interviewing, as it is a time-consuming and resource-intensive technique that can only involve a few stakeholders at a time. Assembling a requirements traceability matrix is not an elicitation activity, but an analysis activity that involves linking the requirements to their sources and deliverables using a tool or document. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 10; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50.

Before beginning requirements elicitation, the business analyst should document how the relevant systems interact. This is an important activity that helps to understand the current state of the systems, their interfaces, dependencies, and data flows. It also helps to identify the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement in the systems. Documenting how the systems interact can be done using various techniques, such as system context diagrams, data flow diagrams, or interface analysis12.

Preparing the requirements traceability matrix, defining how the solution will be evaluated, and drafting a high-level data model are not activities that should be initiated before beginning requirements elicitation. These activities are part of the analysis, validation, and management of the requirements, and they should be done after the requirements have been elicited12.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 131-132

Decomposition is an analysis technique that breaks down a complex system, process, or problem into smaller and simpler components. It helps to identify the tasks, activities, functions, features, and requirements that are necessary to implement the deliverable. Decomposition also helps to organize, structure, and prioritize the components based on their dependencies and relationships. Organization, dependency, and interface are not analysis techniques, but rather aspects or results of decomposition . References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 131-132

The requirements sign-off is a process that involves obtaining the formal approval and acceptance of the requirements from the customer and other stakeholders. The requirements sign-off confirms that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the customer’s needs and expectations. The requirements sign-off also establishes a baseline for the development and testing of the solution, and serves as a reference point for managing changes and resolving issues. The business analyst should first facilitate the requirements sign-off with the customer before the developers start development, to ensure that the requirements are agreed upon and validated by all parties, and to avoid rework, delays, and conflicts later in the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

The rationale for each requirement is the justification or explanation of why the requirement is needed and how it supports the business objectives. It should include the reasons and assumptions behind the requirement, as well as any constraints or dependencies that affect it. The product vision and operational relationships are part of the business case, not the rationale. The stakeholder impact and design decisions are part of the analysis and solution evaluation, not the rationale. The functional relationships and work breakdown structure code are part of the solution scope and architecture, not the rationale. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113.

The next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards is to ensure that the requirements are validated. Validation is a process that confirms that the requirements align with the business objectives, stakeholder needs, and expected value of the project. Validation also ensures that the requirements are feasible, acceptable, and testable. Validation can be performed by using techniques such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, or demonstrations. Validation can help to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, or conflicts in the requirements before they are approved and implemented. Setting the priority of the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that determines the order and importance of the requirements based on their value, risk, urgency, or dependency. Priority can be set before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not verify or confirm that the requirements meet the stakeholder expectations or project goals. Communicating the requirements to stakeholders is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that involves sharing and presenting the requirements to relevant stakeholders for feedback, approval, or implementation. Communication can be done before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not check or ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business objectives or deliver value to the stakeholders. Baselineing the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that establishes an agreed-upon version of the requirements as a reference point for further changes or development. Baselineing can be done only after validating and approving the requirements, as it implies that they are complete, correct, clear, and consistent. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

Requirements are statements of the needs, expectations, or conditions that must be met by a solution. Requirements should be clear, complete, consistent, and testable, so that they can be understood, verified, and validated by the stakeholders. If the requirements are not ready for peer review, it means that they have not met these quality criteria, and that they need to be refined or revised. One possible cause of this situation is that the requirements do not provide all of the information needed to define the work, such as the scope, objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, etc. This would make it difficult for the peer reviewers to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and alignment of the requirements with the business needs and goals. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. Some requirements having not yet been discussed in a work group session is not a reason to delay the peer review, as long as the requirements have been elicited from the relevant sources and documented properly. The requirements’ reference codes not tracing to the attribute numbers in the work breakdown structure is a minor issue that can be easily fixed by updating the reference codes or the work breakdown structure. The requirements documents having not yet received sign-off from the sponsor is not a prerequisite for peer review, as sign-off is usually obtained after the peer review and validation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

 A requirements baseline document is the most valuable document for a business analyst to provide to the project sponsor to know which requirements will be implemented. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It also serves as a reference point for managing changes and measuring progress. A requirements traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationship between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design, test cases, or deliverables. A requirements traceability matrix can help to ensure completeness, consistency, and quality of the requirements, but it does not indicate which requirements will be implemented. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan can help to define the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements, but it does not specify which requirements will be implemented. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix can help to evaluate the performance or quality of a solution, but it does not determine which requirements will be implemented. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

Nonfunctional requirements are the characteristics or qualities of a solution that describe how well it performs or operates. They include aspects such as usability, reliability, availability, scalability, security, performance, etc. The website crashing frequently indicates that the nonfunctional requirements related to availability and performance were not identified and tested properly. Quality attributes are another term for nonfunctional requirements, so option A is equivalent to option C. Critical business requirements and essential product requirements are both functional requirements, which describe what a solution does or provides, not how well it does it. Therefore, options B and D are incorrect. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 114-115.

The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process that should be done by the business analyst after the software developers have delivered a completed solution and the quality assurance team has passed it. User acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. User acceptance testing can help to ensure that the solution is fit for use, suitable for purpose, and aligned with business objectives. Evaluating the solution against the project charter is not necessary at this stage, as it does not involve testing or validation by the end users or stakeholders. Evaluating the solution with the sponsor(s) is not sufficient at this stage, as it does not capture the perspective of all relevant users or stakeholders who will use or benefit from the solution. Conducting performance testing is not relevant at this stage, as it is usually done by the quality assurance team before delivering the solution to ensure that it meets the non-functional requirements such as speed, reliability, scalability, etc. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

The business analyst could use the expected vs. actual results technique to iteratively validate the solution. This technique involves comparing the expected results or outcomes of the solution with the actual results or outcomes that are observed or measured after the solution is implemented. This technique helps to verify that the solution meets the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and to identify any gaps, issues, or defects that need to be resolved or corrected. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 25; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 141.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a vision/scope document is a document that describes the high-level vision, scope, and objectives of a project or initiative. It also defines the key stakeholders, business needs, expected benefits, assumptions, constraints, and risks. A vision/scope document can help to align the stakeholders’ views of organizational improvement with the project’s purpose and direction. It can also help to establish a common understanding and agreement among the stakeholders, and provide a basis for planning and prioritizing the requirements. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

A configuration management system is a tool that can be used to trace the large number of requirements that will be generated by this project. A configuration management system is a system that consists of the processes, procedures, tools, and databases that are used to manage and control the configuration items of the project. A configuration item is any component of the project that has a defined and approved version, such as a requirement, a deliverable, a document, a model, a test case, etc. A configuration management system can help the business analyst and the project team to record, track, update, and maintain the configuration items throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure their consistency, integrity, and traceability. A configuration management system can also help to handle changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 MoSCoW is a requirements prioritization method that classifies requirements into four categories: Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This method helps the business analyst and the stakeholders to agree on the essential requirements that must be delivered within a fixed time frame, and the desirable requirements that can be deferred or dropped if necessary. MoSCoW is suitable for this project because it allows the business analyst to focus on the minimum viable product that meets the business need of replacing the current enrollment and billing software application before the vendor contract ends, and to cope with the large volume of requirements by prioritizing them based on their value and urgency. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 This situation could have been avoided if a change control process for requirements and their statuses was followed. A change control process is a set of procedures and tools that helps the business analyst to manage changes to the requirements, and to document and communicate the impact and approval of the changes. A change control process also helps to maintain the traceability and quality of the requirements, and to ensure that they are aligned with the business needs and the project scope. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

 Agile is an approach to enable developers and product owners to be in constant communication so that changes or issues that occur during development are exposed and discussed as they develop. Agile emphasizes iterative and incremental delivery of value, collaboration, feedback, and adaptation. Agile methods include Scrum, Kanban, XP, and others. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 17.

A SWOT analysis is a technique that helps to assess the internal and external factors that may affect the success of a solution or an option. A SWOT analysis involves identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each option, and comparing them with the business problem and the desired outcomes. A SWOT analysis can help the stakeholders to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and desirability of each option, and to select the best one based on the strategic alignment and the business value. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 41.

 Business use cases are the documents that the business analyst should pay the most attention to ensure the project succeeds this time. Business use cases are documents that describe the interactions between the users and the system, and the value or benefit that the users obtain from the system. Business use cases can help the business analyst and the project team to understand the business needs, goals, and expectations of the stakeholders, and to define the scope, functionality, and behavior of the system. Business use cases can also help to verify and validate that the system meets the requirements and delivers the desired outcomes. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 93.

The main reason for the business failure was a failure to establish measurable success criteria in the business case. The success criteria are the standards or indicators that are used to measure the achievement of the business objectives and the expected benefits of the project. The success criteria should be defined and agreed upon by the stakeholders in the business case, and they should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound (SMART). The success criteria can help the business analyst and the project team to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and desirability of the project, and to monitor and control the project performance and outcomes. The success criteria can also help to ensure the alignment of the project deliverables with the stakeholder expectations and the market needs. If the success criteria are not established or are poorly defined in the business case, the project may fail to deliver the desired value and return on investment, even if it meets the time, cost, scope, and quality constraints. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 16; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 86.

One of the main purposes for creating a requirements traceability matrix is to track how requirements can be connected to the solution. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to track the origin, allocation, dependencies, and status of the requirements throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure that the solution meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to manage changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the solution. A requirements traceability matrix can be created using various formats, such as a table, a spreadsheet, or a database12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

 The MoSCoW technique is a prioritization technique that helps to rank requirements according to their importance and urgency. The acronym stands for Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This technique can help the business analyst to manage requirements by focusing on the most critical ones and minimizing the scope creep. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

 A change control process is a process that could help manage the situation of scope creep. Scope creep refers to the problem experienced on many projects when the size or complexity of the original product description grows. Scope creep can have negative impacts on the project schedule, budget, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. A change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, requirements, deliverables, or other configuration items are requested, evaluated, approved, implemented, and monitored. A change control process can help the business analyst and the project team to manage the expectations of the stakeholders, to assess the impact and feasibility of the changes, to prioritize and implement the changes, and to communicate the changes to the relevant parties. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

 The technical staff and testing team from Company A are responsible for writing and coding the requirements and testing the new functionality. Responsible means that the person or group is assigned to perform the work or activity. The responsible role is often indicated by the letter R in a RACI matrix, which is a tool for identifying roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.3; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 2.

 Phased baselining is an approach that involves dividing the requirements into smaller subsets or increments that can be approved, developed, and delivered separately. Phased baselining can help to cope with the requirements’ volatility, as it allows the business analyst and the stakeholders to accommodate changes and feedback in each increment, and to adjust the scope and priorities of the subsequent increments accordingly. Phased baselining can also reduce the risk and uncertainty of the project, as it enables early validation and verification of the solution, and provides more flexibility and adaptability to the changing business environment and regulations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

Decision trees, weighted matrix, and context diagrams are tools and techniques that can help the business analyst to maximize business value while establishing the requirements baseline. Decision trees are graphical representations of possible outcomes and choices based on certain conditions or criteria. Decision trees can help to evaluate and select the best option among multiple alternatives based on their expected value or risk. Weighted matrix are tables that assign scores and weights to different factors or measures to compare and prioritize them. Weighted matrix can help to rank the requirements based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. Context diagrams are visual models that show the boundaries and interactions of a system or product with its environment. Context diagrams can help to define the scope and stakeholders of a project, as well as their needs and expectations. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11-12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66-69.

The business analyst is using a bottom-up estimation technique, which involves breaking down the work into smaller components and estimating the time and resources needed for each component. Then, the estimates are aggregated to obtain the total estimate for the project. Bottom-up estimation is more accurate and reliable than other techniques, but it also requires more time and effort. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 85.

Interface modeling is a technique to describe how different components or systems interact with each other and exchange information. Interface modeling can be used to depict how the solution will work with all of the company’s systems by showing the inputs, outputs, and dependencies of each system. Interface modeling can help to identify potential integration issues, gaps, and conflicts among the systems. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Data modeling is a technique to define the structure, format, and relationships of data. Rules modeling is a technique to define the logic, constraints, and policies that govern the behavior of the solution. Enterprise modeling is a technique to describe the structure, culture, and processes of an organization. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 54.

 Asking stakeholders to vote on the requirements is a technique that the business analyst can employ to rectify the issue of not having enough resources to deliver all the requirements. Voting is a method of prioritizing requirements by asking stakeholders to rank or rate them according to their importance, urgency, value, or risk. Voting can help to identify the most critical or essential requirements that should be delivered first or within the available resources. Voting can also help to resolve conflicts or disagreements among stakeholders and reach a consensus on the priority of the requirements. Holding a brainstorming workshop to build the rationale for the requirements is not an effective technique to rectify the issue, as it does not address the resource constraint or the priority of the requirements. Brainstorming is a method of generating ideas or solutions by encouraging free and creative thinking from participants. Brainstorming can help to elicit or analyze requirements, but not prioritize them. Performing traceability to find out where the requirements originated is not a useful technique to rectify the issue, as it does not indicate the importance or value of the requirements. Traceability is a process of tracking the relationship between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design, test cases, or deliverables. Traceability can help to ensure completeness, consistency, and quality of the requirements, but not prioritize them. Surveying stakeholders on their likes and dislikes about the requirements is not a viable technique to rectify the issue, as it does not provide a clear or objective way of prioritizing the requirements. Surveying is a method of collecting feedback from stakeholders by asking them questions about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. Surveying can help to validate or evaluate the requirements, but not prioritize them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a Pareto analysis is a tool that helps to prioritize problems or causes based on their frequency or impact. It is based on the Pareto principle, which states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. A Pareto analysis can help to identify the high-priority changes needed to improve a service by showing which problems or causes account for most of the complaints or dissatisfaction. A work breakdown structure analysis, a flowchart, and a cause-and-effect diagram are other tools that can help to analyze a service, but they do not necessarily help to prioritize the changes needed to improve it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 145-146.

 Inspection is a technique or tool that is used to obtain acceptance of the delivered product. Inspection is a process that involves examining and measuring the product or its components against the predefined standards, criteria, or specifications, to determine its quality, completeness, and correctness. Inspection can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and correct any defects, errors, or deviations in the product, and to ensure that it meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. Inspection can also help to obtain the formal approval and acceptance of the product from the customer and other stakeholders, and to confirm that the product is ready for delivery or deployment. Inspection can be done using various methods, such as reviews, walkthroughs, audits, or tests. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

The business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project or program. It describes the business problem or opportunity, the benefits and costs of the proposed solution, and the risks and assumptions involved. The business case also includes the intangible costs and benefits associated with the change, such as the disruption and short-term loss of productivity that the client anticipates. The business analyst can use the business case to communicate the value proposition of the project or program to the stakeholders and decision makers. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 4.

A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the possible causes of a problem or an effect. It can help the business analyst to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing. A fishbone diagram has a structure that resembles a fish skeleton, with a head, a spine, and several branches. The head represents the problem or the effect, the spine represents the main cause categories, and the branches represent the sub-causes or factors that contribute to the problem or the effect. By creating a fishbone diagram, the business analyst can brainstorm and organize the potential causes of the software flaw, and then investigate and verify the most likely root cause. A fishbone diagram can also help to communicate the findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and the development team. An interface analysis is a tool that helps to identify and describe the interactions and dependencies between different components or systems. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not focus on the causes and effects of the problem. A Delphi estimation is a tool that helps to obtain a consensus among a group of experts on a complex or uncertain issue. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not provide a systematic and structured way to identify and analyze the causes of the problem. A functional decomposition is a tool that helps to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components or functions. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not show the relationships and influences between the components or functions. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Root Cause Analysis: Definition, Examples & Methods | Tableau1

 Using a table to map business rules to functional requirements ensures that all tax and fee calculations are implemented correctly. It helps in verifying that the system reflects current regulations and avoids calculation errors. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 Time-boxing is a prioritization technique that involves assigning a fixed amount of time or resource to each requirement or deliverable, and delivering as much value as possible within that time or resource constraint. Time-boxing is useful when the project has a tight timeline or budget, and the stakeholders have too many requirements for the delivery window. Time-boxing helps to focus on the most important and valuable requirements, and to manage the expectations and scope of the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

The customer and the business analyst are collaborating in the development of a solution scope, which is a description of the boundaries, assumptions, and deliverables of the solution that will address the business need. It is important for the customer to spend the time required to provide, clarify, and elaborate requirements, because requirements are the basis for defining the solution scope. Requirements are the capabilities, features, functions, and qualities that the solution must have or meet to satisfy the customer and the stakeholders. By providing, clarifying, and elaborating requirements, the customer can help the business analyst to understand the problem, the needs, the expectations, and the value proposition of the solution. This will enable the business analyst to define a solution scope that is aligned with the customer’s vision and goals, and that is feasible, viable, and desirable. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 15.

 A use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system to achieve a goal or perform a task. A use case consists of a main scenario and possible alternative scenarios that capture the normal, exceptional, and error flows of events. A use case can also include the acceptance criteria that specify the conditions that must be met for the use case to be successfully completed and accepted by the stakeholders. The test team can review the use cases to help identify the acceptance criteria for the solution, as they provide a comprehensive and realistic view of the expected behavior and outcomes of the system. The test team can also use the use cases to design and execute test cases that verify and validate the functional requirements and acceptance criteria of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 99.

 A use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system to achieve a goal or perform a task. A use case consists of a main scenario and possible alternative scenarios that capture the normal, exceptional, and error flows of events. A use case can be used as a source for building tests of end-to-end business processes across business functions and systems, as it provides a comprehensive and realistic view of the expected behavior and outcomes of the solution. A use case can also help to verify and validate the functional requirements and acceptance criteria of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 99.

The system requirements verification matrix is a tool that helps to track the status of each requirement throughout the project lifecycle. It shows whether a requirement has been accepted, rejected, deferred, or implemented. The business analyst should have used this tool to record the reasons for rejection or deferral of any requirement, as well as the impact and resolution of such changes. This way, the business analyst can easily provide a list of rejected and deferred requirements to the project manager upon request. Setting up a change control board is not enough to track the number of rejections, as it does not provide a detailed record of each requirement’s status. Limiting the number of rejected requirements on the project is not a realistic or helpful approach, as some requirements may be invalid, incomplete, or conflicting and need to be rejected or deferred for the benefit of the project. Spending more time up-front reviewing the requirements may reduce the chances of rejections, but it does not guarantee that no requirement will be rejected or deferred later in the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

 Quality function deployment (QFD) is a technique that involves translating customer needs or requirements into product features or specifications. QFD helps to relate the product features to customer value by using a matrix called a House of Quality, which shows how each feature satisfies a customer requirement, how important each requirement is to the customer, how well each feature performs compared to competitors, and how each feature affects other features. QFD can also help to identify gaps or opportunities for improvement in the product design. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

Internal rate of return (IRR) is a technique that calculates the annualized rate of return of an investment or a project. IRR can help the business analyst to determine the estimated growth rate of potential solution options by comparing the present value of the expected cash inflows and outflows of each option. IRR can also help to select the option that has the highest rate of return and exceeds the minimum required rate of return or the cost of capital. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 Prototyping is a tool or technique that could have been used by the business analyst to avoid the situation of unclear and conflicting requirements. Prototyping is the process of creating a simplified and partial version of the product or system that can be used to elicit, validate, and refine the requirements. Prototyping can help the business analyst and the stakeholders to visualize the solution, to identify and resolve any issues or gaps, and to reach a common understanding and agreement on the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 94.

The business analyst should follow the change control process to handle the new regulatory mandate that affects the project. The change control process is a set of procedures that defines how changes to the requirements or the project scope are identified, analyzed, approved, and implemented. The change control process helps to ensure that changes are aligned with the business need, the project objectives, and the stakeholder expectations. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 9, Section 9.4.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain IV: Traceability and Monitoring, Task 2.

A requirements traceability tool is a tool that provides combined functionality for business analysis and quality assurance activities. It helps to document and track the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the sources of the requirements, and the project deliverables. It also helps to monitor the status, changes, and verification of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability tool can also support the analysis, validation, and testing of the requirements, as well as the evaluation of the solution quality and performance12.

A functional specification tool is a tool that helps to define and document the functional requirements of a system or a solution. It describes the features, functions, behaviors, and inputs and outputs of the system or the solution. It also specifies the acceptance criteria and the expected results of the system or the solution. A functional specification tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities13.

A system use case modeling tool is a tool that helps to illustrate and communicate the interactions and scenarios between the users and the system or the solution. It uses diagrams, symbols, and text to represent the actors, use cases, relationships, and flows of events of the system or the solution. It also defines the preconditions, postconditions, and exceptions of each use case. A system use case modeling tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities14.

A solution quality assurance tool is a tool that helps to measure and evaluate the quality of the system or the solution. It uses various methods and techniques, such as testing, inspection, review, audit, and feedback, to check the quality of the system or the solution against the quality standards and criteria. It also identifies and reports any quality issues, defects, or errors of the system or the solution. A solution quality assurance tool is mainly used for quality assurance activities, but not for business analysis activities1 .

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 135; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125

 The change control process is a set of procedures and tools that are used to manage changes to the requirements and the solution throughout the project life cycle. The change control process is defined in the business analysis plan, which is a document that describes how the business analysis activities will be performed, monitored, and controlled. The business analysis plan also specifies the roles and responsibilities of the business analyst and other stakeholders involved in the change control process. The business analyst should follow the change control process as defined in the business analysis plan to ensure that any changes to the requirements are properly documented, analyzed, approved, communicated, and implemented. By following the change control process, the business analyst can avoid scope creep, maintain the quality and integrity of the requirements, and align the solution with the business needs and objectives. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

 The business analyst should trace the requirements and measure the impact of the requested changes on the existing delivery date. Tracing the requirements means identifying the source, dependencies, and relationships of the requirements, and ensuring their alignment with the business needs, objectives, and expectations. Measuring the impact of the changes means assessing how the changes will affect the scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk of the project. These actions can help the business analyst and the project team to evaluate the feasibility and priority of the changes, and to communicate the implications and alternatives to the customer and other stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

 A RACI matrix is a tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in a project or a process. It clarifies who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or deliverable. The business analyst should refer to the RACI matrix to identify who is responsible for signoff, as this person has the authority and accountability to approve the solution and its testing results. Contacting the sponsor, the stakeholder who provided the majority of requirements, or the project manager may not be appropriate, as they may not be the designated person for signoff according to the RACI matrix. No signoff is necessary is incorrect, as signoff is an important step to confirm that the solution meets the requirements and acceptance criteria. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

 Observation is a technique that involves watching how people perform their tasks and activities in their natural work environment. Observation can be used to gain an objective, first-hand insight into tasks and activities that are difficult to describe, as it allows the business analyst to see the actual behavior, interactions, processes, and problems of the users or customers. Observation can also help to identify the implicit, hidden, or unspoken needs and expectations of the users or customers, as well as to validate the information obtained from other elicitation techniques. Observation can be done in two ways: passive or active. Passive observation means that the business analyst does not interfere or participate in the tasks and activities, but only records and analyzes what is observed. Active observation means that the business analyst interacts with the users or customers, asks questions, and provides feedback during the observation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

The person identified in the RACI matrix as accountable for deployment approval is the one who should be contacted by the business analyst to review the testing results and get approval to proceed with deployment. The RACI matrix defines who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or deliverable in a project or a process. The accountable person has the authority and accountability to approve or reject the work. The tester identified in the testing strategy is not necessarily the one who can approve deployment, as they may only be responsible for conducting testing. The project manager identified in the project charter may not have the authority to approve deployment, as they may only be responsible for managing the project. The project sponsor identified in the scope document may not be involved in deployment approval, as they may only be informed of the project progress and outcomes.

The business analyst would recommend formal signoff to the group if errors in the product could result in financial solvency. Formal signoff is a process that ensures that the stakeholders agree on and approve the requirements and deliverables of the project. Formal signoff can help to reduce ambiguity, confusion, or disputes among the stakeholders and increase their accountability and commitment to the project. Formal signoff is especially important when errors in the product could result in financial solvency, as it implies that there is a high level of risk, complexity, or regulation involved in the project and that any mistake or defect could have severe consequences for the organization or its customers. The industry being unregulated is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less need for compliance or verification of the product quality or performance. The project impact being contained within a small department of the company is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less stakeholder involvement or interest in the project outcome or value. The organization following an iterative project life cycle is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is more flexibility and adaptability in the project scope and deliverables and that feedback and validation are obtained frequently throughout the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, the requirements baseline is a version of the requirements that has been formally reviewed and agreed upon by the stakeholders, and that serves as a basis for further development and validation activities. The requirements baseline is ready for sign-off when the requirements are clear, consistent, complete, and validated. These are the four characteristics of good requirements that ensure that they are understandable, unambiguous, accurate, and feasible. Complete means that the requirements cover all the necessary aspects of the business problem or opportunity, and that they do not have any gaps or omissions. Clear means that the requirements are expressed in simple and precise language, and that they avoid any jargon or ambiguity. Consistent means that the requirements do not have any conflicts or contradictions with each other or with the business objectives. Validated means that the requirements have been checked and confirmed by the stakeholders, and that they meet their needs and expectations. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 183-184.

A requirements management plan is a document that describes how the requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. It typically includes the following components12:

• Requirements work plan: This component defines the activities, tasks, resources, schedule, and deliverables for the requirements process. It also identifies the roles and responsibilities of the requirements team and other stakeholders.
• Prioritization process: This component describes the criteria and methods for prioritizing the requirements based on their value, urgency, risk, dependency, and other factors. It also defines the levels of priority and how they will be communicated and updated.
• Traceability matrix template: This component provides a format for documenting the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the sources of the requirements, and the project deliverables. It also helps to track the status, changes, and verification of the requirements.
• Other components: Depending on the project context and complexity, the requirements management plan may also include other components, such as requirements definition, requirements attribute template, requirements change control process, requirements communication plan, requirements validation plan, and requirements metrics12. References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121-122

Persona analysis is a technique that involves creating fictional characters that represent different user groups within the company. Persona analysis can help the business analyst to evaluate the solution’s acceptance criteria by providing a detailed narrative of each user group’s needs, goals, preferences, and behaviors. Persona analysis can also help to prioritize the requirements and design features that best suit each user group. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 67.

 A change-driven approach is the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A change-driven approach is an adaptive and iterative approach that embraces changes and feedback throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the organization to explore different options and alternatives for the solution and deliver value incrementally and frequently. A change-driven approach is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A plan-driven approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A plan-driven approach is a predictive and sequential approach that follows a detailed plan and minimizes changes and deviations from the baseline. It requires the organization to have a clear and stable vision of the solution and deliver value at the end of the project. A plan-driven approach is suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A waterfall approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A waterfall approach is a type of plan-driven approach that divides the project into distinct phases and completes each phase before moving to the next one. It does not allow for any changes or revisions once a phase is completed. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have very simple, well-defined, and fixed requirements and solutions. An analytical approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. An analytical approach is a technique or a method for solving problems or making decisions based on data, logic, and reasoning. It does not refer to a specific project management or business analysis approach. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 28-29; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best practices for managing changes to requirements is to communicate them to all relevant stakeholders and solicit their feedback before approving or rejecting the change request. This ensures that the impact of the change is understood and agreed upon by all parties, and that the change does not introduce any conflicts or inconsistencies with the existing requirements. By sharing the new requirements with all stakeholders and asking them to submit their comments before the meeting, the business analyst can facilitate a constructive discussion and reach a consensus on how to proceed with the change request. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 287-288.