SPLK-5001 Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Questions and Answers

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Personal Data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. An individual's address, combined with their first and last name, clearly identifies a person, making it Personal Data under GDPR. The other options provided do not meet the GDPR criteria for Personal Data: the birth date of an unidentified user does not identify a person, the name of a deceased individual is not covered under GDPR, and a company’s registration number pertains to an entity rather than a natural person.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain® is a widely recognized framework that breaks down the stages of a cyber attack. The stages are: Reconnaissance, Weaponization, Delivery, Exploitation, Installation, Command and Control (C2), and Actions on Objectives. The scenario described—modifying the registry on a compromised Windows system to ensure malware runs at boot time—fits into theInstallationphase. This phase involves placing a persistent backdoor or other malicious software on the victim's system, ensuring it can be executed again, even after a system reboot. By modifying the registry, the attacker is achieving persistence, a classic example of the Installation phase.

Web Proxy Logsare the most direct and relevant data source for determining whether a user visited a malicious website. Proxy servers act as intermediaries for user HTTP/HTTPS requests and record detailed metadata about web traffic including URLs visited, timestamps, user IDs, and other HTTP headers.

Web Proxy Logsprovide explicit visibility into outbound web requests from users, which is essential for detecting visits to malicious domains or IPs.

Active Directory Logstrack authentication and directory service activities but do not record web browsing data.

Intrusion Detection Logsmonitor suspicious network or host behaviors but may not have precise records of web destinations.

Web Server Logslog incoming requests to a specific server but do not reflect user browsing outside that server.

Splunk’s security analyst documentation emphasizes leveraging proxy logs for user activity tracking and threat detection related to web-based threats.

In this scenario, the analyst cannot conclude whether the Notable Event is a true positive or a false positive due to the absence of necessary logs and artifacts. The appropriate event disposition in this case is "Other," as it indicates that further action is required, such as ingesting the missing logs. The involvement of a security engineer to ensure the necessary data is available for proper investigation is implied, making "Other" the most suitable option.

For creating a custom dashboard focused on typosquatting, theNew Domain Analysisdashboard in Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) would be a relevant starting point. Typosquatting typically involves the registration of domains similar to legitimate domains to deceive users, which is closely related to the analysis of newly registered or observed domains. This dashboard already includes tools and visualizations for monitoring and analyzing domain name activity, which can be adapted for the specific needs of monitoring for typosquatting.

Adaptive Response is a feature in Splunk's Enterprise Security (ES) framework that allows security teams to automate actions and responses based on alerts or notable events. This feature is pivotal for orchestrating automated incident response processes, reducing the time between detection and response, and integrating Splunk with external systems to trigger appropriate actions.

Purpose:Adaptive Response enables the automation of specific tasks or workflows based on security events detected by Splunk ES. For instance, it can trigger actions such as isolating a compromised host, blocking IP addresses, or enriching data by querying additional sources when a notable event occurs.

Mechanism:When a notable event is identified within the Splunk platform, Adaptive Response can execute a series of predefined actions. These actions can be configured within the Splunk interface, allowing them to run automatically or with manual approval depending on the organization's needs. This capability is essential for streamlining security operations, especially in environments where quick response is critical.

Integration with External Applications:One of the key features of Adaptive Response is its ability to integrate with third-party security tools and solutions. This integration extends the capabilities of Splunk by allowing it to interact with other systems likefirewalls, intrusion prevention systems (IPS), endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, and ticketing systems. This ensures a coordinated and comprehensive defense mechanism.

Usage in Security Operations:Security analysts often rely on Adaptive Response for managing and automating common security tasks, such as:

Quarantine or isolate a hostin response to malware detection.

Trigger a full disk scanwhen suspicious activity is detected.

Notify relevant stakeholdersthrough ticketing systems or direct communication tools.

Update firewall rulesto block traffic from a suspicious IP address.

In theSplunk Common Information Model (CIM), the Authentication Data Model defines standardized field names to normalize data from various sources. For privilege escalation events, the user who initiates the escalation (i.e., the actor performing the elevated action) is represented by the fieldsrc_user. This field captures the source or originating user account involved in the authentication event.

src_user: Typically refers to the user who initiated the action, such as the account escalating privileges.

dest_user: Refers to the target user account involved, such as the user being impersonated or the elevated account.

src_user_idandusernameare either deprecated or less precise in CIM for privilege escalation contexts.

TheSplunk CIM documentation(specifically the Authentication Data Model section) states thatsrc_useris the correct normalized field to capture the initiating user in escalation or impersonation events, supporting consistent searches, alerts, and dashboards across varied log sources.

The primary difference between a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack and a Denial of Service (DoS) attack is in the source of the attack. ADDoSattack involves multiple compromised systems (often part of a botnet) attacking a single target, overwhelming it with traffic or requests. In contrast, aDoSattack typically involves a single source attacking the target. The goal of both attacks is to make a service unavailable, but DDoS attacks are usually more difficult to defend against because of their distributed nature.

In Splunk,default metadatarefers to automatically assigned attributes associated with each event at indexing time that help identify and organize data. These include:

Source: The origin of the data (file, network port, etc.)

Timestamps: The time the event occurred, extracted from the event or assigned at ingestion

Host name: The name of the host generating the event

Event descriptionis not a default metadata field in Splunk. It is typically user-defined or derived from the event content and is not assigned automatically by Splunk.

TheSplunk documentationon event metadata clarifies these standard fields, which are crucial for search filtering and data organization.

Thetstatscommand in Splunk is designed for highly efficient querying of large datasets because it operates primarily onindexed metadatarather than the full raw event data. Indexed metadata consists of pre-extracted, summarized information such as field values, timestamps, and host information, which is stored in a highly optimized format. This allowststatsto return results much faster than thestatscommand, which processes raw event data after retrieval.

tstatsqueries accelerated data models or index metadata directly, reducing disk I/O and CPU usage.

statsoperates on raw events, which can be expensive in terms of resources for large datasets.

The SQL-like syntax oftstats(Option C) is a convenience but not the reason for its performance benefits.

tstatsdoes not search raw logs for extracted fields; that is the domain of thestatscommand.

Splunk’s official documentation and theCybersecurity Defense Analyst Study Guideemphasize the importance oftstatsfor performance-optimized queries in security operations and large-scale data analysis.

Abaselineis a representation or model of normal network activity, capturing expected patterns and behaviors over time. It serves as a reference point against which anomalies and deviations can be detected. By establishing a baseline, security analysts can identify unusual activities that might indicate security incidents.

Baselineinvolves statistical analysis of historical data to define normal ranges for metrics like traffic volume, connection rates, or login times.

Clusterrefers to grouping similar data points, often used in anomaly detection but not synonymous with a model of normal activity.

Time seriesis a sequence of data points indexed in time order, useful for monitoring trends but not specifically a model of normalcy.

Data modelrefers to an abstract schema for organizing data, such as Splunk’s CIM data models.

TheSplunk Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Study Guidehighlights baselining as a fundamental technique in anomaly detection and network security monitoring.

The key requirement is to calculate arunning total of distinct IP addressesover time, which involves both aggregation (stats dc(clientip) by _time) and cumulative calculation (streamstats dc(ipa) as "Cumulative total").

Option Acorrectly bins events by day (bin _time span=1d), calculates distinct counts (dc(clientip)) per day, and then applies streamstats to compute the running (cumulative) count across the timeline.

Option Bcalculates daily distinct counts but does not provide a running total.

Option Csimply formats a table without aggregation.

Option Daggregates by user, not by day, and misses cumulative counts.

TheSplunk Search Manualrecommends using streamstats with distinct count fields to obtain running totals for time series data.

Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) provides various features to enhance security monitoring, analysis, and incident response. One of the powerful features in Splunk ES isAnnotations. This feature allows security analysts to map and categorize correlation search results according to well-known industry frameworks such as the CIS Critical Security Controls, MITRE ATT&CK, and the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain®.

Purpose of Annotations:

Annotations help analysts understand and categorize security events by aligning them with recognized security frameworks. This alignment provides context, making it easier to understand the nature of threats and how they fit within broader threat models or attack strategies.

How Annotations Work:

When a correlation search in Splunk ES triggers an alert, Annotations can automatically tag the alert with relevant tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) from frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. This helps in categorizing the event within the context of known attack patterns, offering insights into potential next steps by an attacker and recommended defensive actions.

Annotations can be manually added or configured to be applied automatically based on the nature of the search results.

Integration with Frameworks:

MITRE ATT&CK:Annotations can map alerts to specific techniques and tactics in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, which provides a detailed knowledge base of adversary behaviors, tactics, and techniques.

CIS Critical Security Controls:These controls can also be mapped through annotations, allowing the organization to measure and improve its security posture against these controls.

Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain®:This model focuses on the stages of a cyberattack, and annotations can help identify where in the kill chain a particular alert fits, providing a clearer understanding of the attack’s progression.

Annotations in Splunk ES:Practical Example:Consider a correlation search that detects unusual behavior indicating potential lateral movement within a network. If this alert is annotated with a reference to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, it might map to techniques like "T1021 - Remote Services," which is associated with the lateral movement tactic. This mapping not only categorizes the event but also helps in planning the next steps for containment and investigation.

Efficiency in Response:By aligning alerts with industry frameworks, annotations help in quickly identifying the nature and potential impact of a threat.

Consistency in Analysis:Provides a standardized method for categorizing and responding to alerts, ensuring that all analysts interpret and react to threats in a consistent manner.

Improved Reporting:Allows for better visualization and reporting of threats according to established frameworks, making it easier to communicate risks and actions to stakeholders.

In a successful Continuous Monitoring initiative, when an analyst identifies the need for more context or additional information, the request typically escalates to aSecurity Engineer. Security Engineers are responsible for the integration and configuration of additional data sources, and they can alter correlation rules or enhance data ingestion pipelines to provide the necessary context for analysts.

Security Engineer:

Manages and optimizes security tools and systems, including SIEM (like Splunk), and ensures that the necessary data sources are integrated into the monitoring environment.

Responsible for creating and tuning correlation rules and maintaining the infrastructure required for continuous monitoring.

Incorrect Options:

A. SOC Manager:Oversees the overall operations of the SOC but does not typically handle the technical integration of data sources.

B. Security Analyst:Primarily focuses on monitoring, detecting, and responding to security incidents, rather than configuring systems.

D. Security Architect:Focuses on the overall design of the security infrastructure, not on the day-to-day integration of data sources.

The log entry showing the same request repeated millions of times indicates aDenial of Service (DoS) Attack, where the server is overwhelmed by a flood of requests to a specific resource, in this case, the/login/page. This type of attack is aimed at making the server unavailable to legitimate users by exhausting its resources.

Denial of Service Attack:

A DoS attack involves a single attacker (or sometimes a small number of sources) sending a massive number of requests to a target server, overwhelming its ability to handle legitimate traffic.

The repetitive log entries reflect the server's inability to process legitimate requests due to the overwhelming number of identical requests.

Incorrect Options:

B. Distributed Denial of Service Attack:This involves multiple sources attacking simultaneously. The log provided does not indicate multiple sources, which would be characteristic of a DDoS attack.

C. Cross-Site Scripting Attack:This attack involves injecting malicious scripts into webpages viewed by other users, not overwhelming a server with traffic.

D. Database Injection Attack:This is an attack against a database via SQL injection or similar techniques, not overwhelming a server with traffic.

TheAccess dashboardsin Splunk Enterprise Security focus on authentication, login activity, access controls, and related security events. These dashboards provide analysts with insights into successful and failed authentications, anomalous access patterns, and identity-related events.

Audit dashboardsgenerally focus on compliance and audit logs.

Asset and Identity dashboardsprovide broader context about users and devices but are not specifically focused on authentication events.

Endpoint dashboardsconcentrate on host and endpoint telemetry such as process execution and file activity.

Splunk’sEnterprise Security User Guideclearly identifies Access dashboards as the primary interface for monitoring and investigating authentication and access behaviors.

The Splunk Security Content library, which includes apps like ESCU (Enterprise Security Content Update) and SSE (Splunk Security Essentials), primarily consists of Dashboards, Reports, and Correlation Searches.Validated architecturesare not a component of these content libraries. Instead, validated architectures refer to predefined, best-practice designs for deploying and configuring Splunk in a way that ensures optimal performance and scalability, which is separate from the content libraries focused on delivering security detections and visualizations.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Thefile_aclfield, which contains access controls associated with files affected by an event, is part of theEndpointdata model in Splunk. The Endpoint data model is designed to include information related to file access, process activity, and user activity on endpoints. Fields likefile_aclare critical for understanding permissions and potential security risks associated with file access and manipulation, which are key aspects of endpoint security monitoring.

Thestatscommand is used to generate statistics, such as counts, over specific fields. In this case, the commandindex=security_logs eventtype=failed_login | stats count as failed_attempts by src_ip | sort -failed_attemptscreates a temporary table that counts the number of failed login attempts (failed_attempts) for each source IP (src_ip). Thesort -failed_attemptsensures the results are ordered by the number of failed attempts in descending order, making it easier for an analyst to identify problematic IPs.

Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)measures the average time it takes for an analyst to investigate and disposition an incident after detection. Improvements in dashboard customization that provide quicker access to relevant data, better visualizations, or faster workflows can reduce MTTR by enhancing analyst efficiency.

Mean Time to Detectmeasures how quickly an incident is identified, not analyst efficiency after detection.

Recovery Timerefers to the time taken to restore systems to normal after an incident.

Dwell Timeis the time an adversary remains undetected within a network.

TheSplunk Cybersecurity Defense Analyst materialshighlight MTTR as a key SOC performance metric influenced by operational improvements, including better dashboards and automated workflows.

TheevalSPL expression in Splunk supports several categories of functions, includingJSON functions(e.g.,spath),Text functions(e.g.,substr,trim), andComparison and Conditional functions(e.g.,if,case). However,Threat functionsis not a valid category within theevalcommand. Theevalcommand is primarily used for transforming and manipulating data in various ways, but it does not include a category specifically for threat-related functions.

Data Model Acceleration (DMA)in Splunk is used to improve search performance by creating summarized, indexed versions of data models that enable much faster retrieval than querying raw indexed data directly. This acceleration is particularly beneficial for complex searches, dashboards, and reports based on large datasets.

DMA precomputes and stores data aggregates, allowing near real-time responses for repeated queries.

It does not normalize data—that function is handled by CIM and data models themselves.

DMA is unrelated to comparing algorithms or modeling response actions.

According toSplunk documentation, enabling acceleration on data models significantly reduces search latency and enhances user experience, especially in security operations with high volumes of data.

Pyramid of Pain Overview:The Pyramid of Pain categorizes indicators based on how difficult they are for attackers to alter:

Hash Values (Low Impact):Attackers can easily change a file's hash by altering even a single byte, rendering this indicator obsolete.

IP Addresses, Domain Names (Moderate Impact):Slightly harder to change than hash values but still relatively easy for attackers to adapt.

TTPs (High Impact):Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures are the most difficult for attackers to alter because they involve the fundamental ways attackers operate. Detecting and responding to TTPs can significantly disrupt an attacker’s strategy.

Why Hash Values Are Least Effective:

Ease of Evasion:Attackers can quickly generate new hash values by modifying files, making it a weak indicator for continuous monitoring.

Short Lifespan:Once detected and blocked, a hash value is of limited use because attackers can simply recompile or pack the malware to create a new hash.

A threat hunt is an iterative process where a hypothesis is developed and tested against data in an environment to detect the presence of threats or adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Understanding the Hypothesis:

The hypothesis here is that a threat actor might userundll32for proxy execution of malicious code and leverage Cobalt Strike for command and control (C2).

The hunt would involve looking for indicators of these specific activities in logs and artifacts like Sysmon logs, netflow, IDS alerts, and EDR data.

Search and Analysis:

The threat hunter performed an extensive search across multiple log sources and found no evidence of Cobalt Strike or the specific malicious activities hypothesized.

Evaluation of the Hypothesis:

If the hypothesis were proven true,the presence of Cobalt Strike or related artifacts would be detected.

However, the hypothesis was not proven; instead, the hunt provided strong evidence that Cobalt Strike and the hypothesized malicious activities are not present.

Successful Threat Hunt:

The goal of threat hunting is not always to find a threat but to gain confidence in the security posture of the environment.

Outcome Dcorrectly identifies that the hunt was successful because it provided strong evidence supporting the absence of the hypothesized threat, thus improving confidence in the organization's security.

In an organization, theSecurity Architectis typically responsible for designing new processes or selecting the tools necessary to protect assets that are identified as being at risk. The Security Architect has the expertise to design a comprehensive security solution that addresses the specific needs of the organization, considering various factors like existing infrastructure, threat landscape, and compliance requirements. They work closely with other roles, such as Security Engineers, to implement these solutions.

The main difference between hypothesis-driven and data-driven threat hunting lies in the approach. Inhypothesis-drivenhunting, the hunter starts with a theory or hypothesis about what kind of malicious activity might be occurring and then searches the data to confirm or refute that hypothesis. On the other hand,data-drivenhunting involves sifting through existing datasets to uncover patterns, anomalies, or activities that were not initially suspected. Hypothesis-driven approaches are more focused and often guided by threat intelligence or knowledge of attacker behaviors, while data-driven approaches rely on broad data analysis to identify unexpected threats.