DAA-C01 SnowPro Advanced: Data Analyst Exam Questions and Answers

This scenario requires a specific combination of Snowflake's extensibility features: the ability to run Python (pandas) code, the ability to return multiple rows for a single input (tabular output), and high performance through vectorization.

A User-Defined Table Function (UDTF) is the correct architectural choice when an input value needs to be expanded into a set of rows. While a standard UDF returns exactly one value per input row, a UDTF can return zero, one, or many rows, making it ideal for "parsing" or "splitting" tasks. By using a Vectorized UDTF (specifically utilizing the Python handler with pandas), the Analyst can process blocks of rows as pandas DataFrames or Series. This is significantly more efficient than processing one row at a time because it reduces the overhead of the Snowflake-to-Python execution engine.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because a standard UDF can only return a single scalar value per input row, making it impossible to "return multiple rows of parsed output."

Option C is incorrect because External Functions are used to call code hosted outside of Snowflake (like an AWS Lambda). While they can process data, they introduce network latency and are not the native way to run pandas code for internal joins.

Option D is incorrect because Stored Procedures are generally used for administrative tasks and procedural logic. While they can return tables, they cannot be directly "joined" with other tables in a standard SELECT statement in the same way a UDTF can.

Option B is the correct choice. It satisfies the requirement for pandas integration, provides the necessary multi-row output via the process and end_partition methods, and allows the analyst to use the LATERAL keyword to join the parsed results directly with existing tables in a single SQL statement.

To determine the output of the final statement, a Data Analyst must perform a step-by-step trace of the code execution, following standard order of operations (inner-to-outer) and procedural logic within the Snowflake Scripting environment.

Step 1: Evaluating the innermost function, func2(10)

The definition for func2 takes a number p and returns p + 10.

Input: 10

Calculation: $10 + 10 = 20$

Result: 20

Step 2: Evaluating the next function, func1(20)

The definition for func1 takes a number v and returns v + 10.

Input: 20 (the result from Step 1)

Calculation: $20 + 10 = 30$

Result: 30

Step 3: Evaluating the procedure call, proc1(30)

The procedure proc1 takes an input variable named result. It then executes a conditional IF statement:

Conditional Check: IF (result >= 30)

Since the input is 30, the condition evaluates to True.

Action: The procedure executes RETURN result - 10.

Calculation: $30 - 10 = 20$

Summary of Logic:

The nested calls flow as follows: call proc1(30) $\rightarrow$ proc1 evaluates $30 \ge 30$ $\rightarrow$ proc1 returns $30 - 10$, which is 20. If the initial input had been lower, such that the final result passed to the procedure was less than 30, it would have followed the ELSE branch and returned the original value. This question evaluates the analyst's ability to interpret modular code and procedural control flow, which are key components of the Data Transformation and Data Modeling domain in the SnowPro Advanced: Data Analyst exam.

Descriptive analytics is the process of using historical data to understand "what happened." This typically involves summarizing large datasets into interpretable chunks using central tendency, dispersion, and frequency measures.

AVG (Average) is a cornerstone of descriptive statistics. It provides the arithmetic mean of a numeric column, allowing an analyst to understand the "typical" value within a dataset (e.g., Average Order Value).

APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT is a descriptive tool used to understand the volume of unique entities within a dataset (e.g., "How many unique customers visited the site?"). Similar to HLL mentioned earlier, this function provides a fast summary of data volume and variety, which is a primary goal of the descriptive phase of analysis.

Evaluating the Options:

Options A and B (REGR_INTERCEPT and REGR_SLOPE) are used for linear regression. These fall under Predictive Analytics, as they are used to model relationships and predict future outcomes, rather than just describing current data.

Option C (ROW_NUMBER) is a window function used for data ranking and ordering, but it does not provide a descriptive summary of the dataset's characteristics.

Options D and E are correct because they provide summary statistics (mean and cardinality) that define the "state" of the data, which is the definition of descriptive analytics.

Working with nested semi-structured data requires a deep understanding of Snowflake's FLATTEN function and path notation. In the provided JSON exhibit, the data is hierarchical: the root contains a key named "events", which is an array containing multiple objects. Each object within that array contains the target field "f".

To transform this into a "consumable, tabular format" where each instance of "f" appears as a separate row, the Data Analyst must "explode" the array. Simply using path notation like data:events:f (Option A) will fail or return NULL because the engine cannot directly map a single path through an array structure to multiple scalar results without an explicit relational transformation.

The LATERAL FLATTEN function is the standard tool for this task. It takes a semi-structured column (or a specific path within it) as an input and returns a relational result set. By specifying input => data:events, the Analyst instructs Snowflake to look specifically at the array. For every element found in that array, FLATTEN generates a new row in the result set. The output of the flatten operation includes a column named VALUE, which represents the specific element (in this case, an object) currently being processed.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A and C are incorrect because they attempt to use direct pathing on an array. Without flattening, the query engine sees the array as a single block of data and cannot reach the "f" key inside individual array elements.

Option B is incorrect because it flattens the root data object. While this works for top-level keys, it wouldn't automatically iterate through the "events" array to expose the "f" values inside it; it would treat the entire array as a single value.

Option D is the 100% correct answer. It correctly targets the "events" array for flattening and then utilizes path notation (value:f) followed by the appropriate type casting (::number) to produce the final tabular output. This is a core competency for any SnowPro Advanced Data Analyst handling modern telemetry or event-based data.

This scenario highlights the rules governing Shared Databases and Cross-Database Joins in Snowflake. When a user acquires data from the Snowflake Marketplace, it arrives in their account as a "Shared Database."

A critical restriction of shared databases is that they are read-only. Users (including Data Analysts and even AccountAdmins) cannot create new objects—such as tables, schemas, or views—directly inside a database created from a share. Therefore, Options A, C, and D are architecturally impossible because they all involve trying to write a new view into the ADDRESS_DATA database.

To combine the shared data with internal data (like the ORDERS table in GLOBAL_DWH), the Analyst must create the view in a database where they have CREATE VIEW privileges and that is writeable. Since GLOBAL_DWH is an internal database owned by the organization, it is the appropriate location to host the logic that joins local data with external enrichment data.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A and C are incorrect because you cannot create objects in a database created from a share.

Option D is incorrect because while IMPORTED_PRIVILEGES are necessary to view the data, they do not grant the ability to create objects within the share.

Option B is the 100% correct answer. By creating the view in the GLOBAL_DWH database (or any other local, non-shared database), the Analyst can successfully reference ADDRESS_DATA.OPENADDRESS and GLOBAL_DWH.PUBLIC.ORDERS in a single SQL statement, effectively creating an enriched data layer for the organization.

To determine the correct result of the query, a Data Analyst must evaluate the nested functions according to standard SQL order of operations while correctly identifying how Snowflake handles NULL values in aggregate calculations.

Step 1: Evaluating AVG(GRADE)

The AVG() function calculates the arithmetic mean of the non-null values in a column. Based on the provided table data, the grades are: 4, 1, 2, 1, and 2. The sixth row contains a NULL grade. In Snowflake, as per ANSI SQL standards, aggregate functions ignore NULL values entirely. They are not treated as zeros, nor do they cause the function to return NULL (unless the entire column is null).

Sum of non-null values: $4 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 10$

Count of non-null values: $5$

Result: $10 / 5 = 2.0$

Step 2: Evaluating CEIL(..., 2)

The CEIL (or CEILING) function is typically used to return the smallest integer value that is greater than or equal to the input. However, Snowflake's CEIL function also supports an optional second argument for scale (precision).

The input is the result from the previous step: 2.0.

The scale argument is 2.

The function CEIL(2.0, 2) attempts to round the value up to the nearest value with two decimal places. Since 2.0 is already a whole number and has no fractional component beyond the specified scale, the ceiling remains 2.0.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect as it represents a massive scaling error.

Option C and D are incorrect because they result from mathematical errors or incorrectly including the NULL row in the denominator (e.g., $10 / 6 = 1.66$, then rounded up).

Option B is the 100% correct answer. It accurately reflects the result of the AVG function ($2.0$) followed by the CEIL operation, which preserves the value as it is already at the target ceiling. This question tests precision in both mathematical logic and the technical nuances of Snowflake-specific SQL functions.

In Snowsight, managing dashboard layouts requires an understanding of how tiles (queries or visualizations) are stored versus how they are displayed. When an analyst wants to remove a tile from the visible dashboard grid without destroying the underlying query logic or historical configuration, the Unplace action is the correct functional choice.

When a tile is unplaced, it is removed from the dashboard's active layout but remains part of the dashboard's "library" of available content. This is a critical distinction from the Delete action (Option C), which permanently removes the tile and its associated SQL code from the dashboard object. Unplacing allows the analyst to "archive" the work temporarily. Because the tile still technically exists within the dashboard's metadata, any new data added to the underlying tables will still be processed by the query whenever the tile is eventually placed back onto the grid.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (Show/Hide) is not a standard standalone command for dashboard tile management in Snowsight; visibility is typically managed through placement on the grid.

Option B (Duplicate) creates a second copy of the tile. While this preserves the data, it does not satisfy the requirement to "hide" the current tile; it actually adds more clutter to the dashboard.

Option C (Delete) is incorrect because the prompt specifies that the data and tile will need to be available in the future. Deleting would require the analyst to rewrite the SQL and reconfigure the visualization from scratch.

Option D is the 100% correct answer. Unplacing is the "soft-remove" feature of Snowsight. It preserves the tile in the "Unplaced Tiles" sidebar, allowing for quick restoration at a later date. This feature is essential for analysts who need to manage evolving reporting requirements where certain metrics may only be relevant seasonally or during specific business cycles.

In Snowsight, the Scorecard chart type is specifically designed to highlight a single key metric (the "Value") and optionally compare it against a static or dynamic benchmark (the "Comparison"). This visualization is a core component of the Data Presentation and Data Visualization domain, as it provides an immediate "at-a-glance" status for high-level KPIs.

1. Interpreting the Scorecard Components:

Primary Value: The large, bold number (38) represents the actual value calculated by the underlying query. In this scenario, it is the company's average employee age.

Secondary Metric (The Percentage): When a scorecard is configured with a comparison value, Snowsight automatically calculates the percentage difference between the primary value and that comparison.

Visual Indicators: The green upward arrow indicates that the primary value is higher than the comparison value. If the value were lower, the arrow would point downward and typically appear in red.

2. The Mathematical Calculation:

The 12% shown in the exhibit is the result of the percentage change formula:

Evaluating the Options:

Options A and D are incorrect because they misidentify the large number (38) as the "comparison." In Snowflake's UI, the large number is always the primary metric being tracked, not the target it is being measured against.

Option B is incorrect because the percentage in a scorecard represents relative difference, not a statistical measure like standard deviation.

Option C is the 100% correct interpretation. It correctly identifies 38 as the current company value and 12% as the calculated difference from the industry benchmark of 34. This level of visual literacy is expected of a SnowPro Advanced: Data Analyst to ensure dashboard insights are communicated accurately to stakeholders.

Working with semi-structured data types like Arrays is a core competency for a Snowflake Data Analyst. In Snowflake, arrays are zero-indexed, meaning the first element is at position 0. Consequently, the index of the last element is always the total number of elements minus one ($Size - 1$).

To retrieve an element from a specific index, Snowflake provides the GET() function. This function takes the array column and the calculated index as arguments. When combined with ARRAY_SIZE(), which returns the total count of elements in the array, the formula ARRAY_SIZE(COL_B)-1 accurately targets the final index regardless of the array's length.

Evaluating the Options:

Option B is incorrect because using ARRAY_SIZE as the index directly (without subtracting 1) results in an "out-of-bounds" error or returns NULL, because the index equals the length (e.g., in an array of 3 items, the max index is 2).

Option C is incorrect. While some programming languages (like Python) allow negative indexing to start from the end, Snowflake SQL does not support this shorthand for arrays; it would simply return NULL.

Option D is incorrect because LAST_VALUE is an Analytic/Window function used to find the last row in a sorted result set, not the last element within a single array cell.

Option A is the 100% correct approach. It uses the standard, robust method for dynamic index calculation. This ensures that even if different rows have arrays of different lengths, the query will always successfully "pluck" the final item from each. This skill is vital for Data Transformation tasks, such as extracting the most recent status from a history array.

Snowflake Cortex ML functions, such as the Forecasting and Anomaly Detection models, are designed to be "black boxes" that provide automated machine learning capabilities directly within SQL. However, for a Data Analyst to trust and validate these models, Snowflake provides specific Object Methods (invoked with the ! operator) to inspect the model's internal logic and performance.

The !EXPLAIN_FEATURE_IMPORTANCE() method is specifically designed to provide transparency into how the model reached its conclusions. When invoked on a trained forecast model, it returns a result set showing which features (such as exogenous variables or time-based components like seasonality and trend) had the most significant impact on the predicted values. This is a critical step in the Data Analysis workflow to ensure that the model is not relying on "noise" or irrelevant data points.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (SHOW_EVALUATION_METRICS) is used to retrieve accuracy statistics like MSE (Mean Squared Error) or MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) from the training phase, but it does not explain the contribution of specific features.

Option B (SHOW_TRAINING_LOGS) is not a standard Cortex ML method; logging details are typically handled internally or through different system views.

Option D (FORECAST) is the primary method used to actually generate the future predictions once the model is trained; it outputs the forecast itself, not the underlying component importance.

Option C is the correct answer as it is the dedicated method for model interpretability, allowing analysts to see the "why" behind the forecast by quantifying the influence of each input variable. This aligns with Snowflake's focus on "Explainable AI" within the Data Cloud.

To achieve the desired result, an analyst must understand the fundamental behavior of different JOIN types within Snowflake and how they affect the retention of records from the "left" or primary table. The goal here is to list all brokers, even those who have zero customers (like "Drew") or customers with zero orders (like "Debby").

In SQL, an INNER JOIN only returns rows when there is a match in both tables. If we were to use an INNER JOIN between BROKER and CUSTOMER, Drew would be excluded from the results because he has no associated records in the CUSTOMER table. Similarly, an INNER JOIN with the ORDERS table would exclude any broker whose customers haven't placed an order.

Evaluating the Join Logic:

Option C is the correct solution because it utilizes a chain of LEFT JOINs. A LEFT JOIN (or LEFT OUTER JOIN) ensures that every record from the left table (BROKER) is preserved in the result set. If no matching record exists in the joined table (CUSTOMER or ORDERS), Snowflake populates the columns with NULL. This is why "Drew" appears with a CUST_COUNT of 0 and "Debby" appears with a NULL for the total order amount.

Option A fails because it uses an INNER JOIN for the CUSTOMER table, which would immediately filter out "Drew."

Option B and Option D fail because they use INNER JOINs at different stages of the query, which would strip away brokers or customers that do not have matching order activity.

Additionally, the query correctly uses COUNT(DISTINCT c.customer_id) to ensure that customers are not double-counted if they have multiple orders, and GROUP BY 1 (referencing b.broker_name) to aggregate the data at the broker level. This pattern is essential for accurate Data Analysis in Snowflake when dealing with "optional" relationships in a star or snowflake schema.

When dealing with massive datasets containing billions of rows, efficiency is paramount. Snowflake provides two primary ways to retrieve a small subset of data: Sampling and Result Set Limiting.

The SAMPLE clause is used to return a subset of rows based on a specific count or percentage. The correct syntax for specifying a fixed number of rows is SAMPLE ( ROWS). This is highly effective for exploratory data analysis where you need to see the shape of the data without the overhead of scanning the entire table. It is important to note that SAMPLE does not guarantee a truly random distribution unless specified, but it is much faster than a full table scan.

The TOP <</b>n> or LIMIT <</b>n> clauses are used to restrict the number of rows returned in the output. The TOP syntax is commonly used in many SQL dialects and is fully supported in Snowflake to return the first "n" rows the query engine encounters. While TOP is often used with an ORDER BY clause to get the highest or lowest values, using it alone on a massive table like FCT_SALES is a standard way to quickly peak at the data.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect syntax; the ROWS keyword and parentheses are required for a fixed count.

Option B is Correct; it uses the standard Snowflake SAMPLE syntax for a specific row count.

Option C and Option E are incorrect because ROWS is not a valid keyword within a TOP clause in Snowflake.

Option D is Correct; it uses the standard TOP syntax to limit the result set.

By using these methods, a Data Analyst ensures they are not wasting compute resources (Credits) by pulling billions of unnecessary rows into the UI or a local environment.