SD-WAN-Engineer Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN Engineer Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The ION Device Data Plane (the software running locally on the hardware appliance at the branch) is the component responsible for the heavy lifting of traffic analysis.

Edge Processing: Prisma SD-WAN uses an "Application-Defined" architecture. The ION device performs Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) on the first few packets of a flow to identify the application (e.g., distinguishing "Skype Video" from "Skype Chat").

Metric Calculation: The ION device timestamping engine calculates the performance metrics (RTT, NTT, SRT) in real-time as packets pass through its interfaces. It aggregates this metadata.

Role of Controller (B): The Controller collects and visualizes this data (Analytics), but it does not generate it. The Controller does not sit in the data path of the user traffic. If the ION relied on the controller for App-ID, latency would be unacceptably high. Therefore, all detection and metric generation happens locally on the ION Device.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

When deploying Prisma Access for Remote Networks (connecting branch offices), the licensing and throughput model is based on aggregate bandwidth allocated to specific compute locations (regions).

Bandwidth Allocation (Option D): Administrators must purchase and allocate a specific amount of bandwidth (e.g., 500 Mbps, 1 Gbps) to a Prisma Access "Compute Location" (e.g., US West, Europe Central). This allocated bandwidth is then shared as a pool among all the branch sites (Remote Networks) that onboard and terminate their IPSec tunnels at that specific location. The system does not allocate bandwidth on a strict per-site basis but rather enforces the limit on the aggregate throughput of the compute node itself.

Policy Enforcement (Option A): Security policies for Prisma Access are enforced in the cloud (at the Prisma Access Service Processing Node), not pushed down to the branch ION devices for local enforcement. The ION device handles local segmentation (ZBFW) and traffic steering, but the "Remote Network" security stack resides in the cloud.

Path Usage (Option C): Prisma SD-WAN is designed to utilize Active/Active paths. When a branch has multiple internet circuits connected to Prisma Access, the CloudBlade and ION automatically build tunnels on all compatible paths and can load-balance traffic across them based on application performance (SLA), rather than defaulting to a strict Active/Standby model for internet traffic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Site Templates (often referred to as Site Configuration Templates) are a critical tool for the Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of large-scale deployments in Prisma SD-WAN.

1. Device Pre-staging (Statement C):

One of the primary capabilities of Site Templates is the creation of Device Shells. A device shell is a configuration container that exists in the controller before the physical hardware is installed or connected. By using a template, an administrator can pre-provision the entire configuration (interfaces, routing, subnets) for the "Site" and "Element" (Device). When the physical ION device is later connected to the internet and claimed (associated with the shell via its Serial Number), it immediately inherits this pre-staged configuration, enabling a true "plug-and-play" deployment.

2. Mandatory Variables (Statement B):

To successfully instantiate a functional site from a generic template, specific unique identifiers are required in the variable data set (typically a CSV file).

Site Name: Identifies the location in the portal.

ION Software Version: Ensures the device boots to the specific validated code version required for the deployment, preventing inconsistencies.

ION Serial Number / Device Name: Required to bind the logical configuration (Shell) to the physical hardware. Even if the serial is added later during the claim process, the structure of the template and the deployment workflow mandates these variables to ensure the device can be uniquely identified and managed within the fabric.

Note on Option D: While it is technically possible to re-deploy a template, the Best Practice for "Day 2" operations (updating or modifying configuration after deployment) is to use Prisma SD-WAN Stacks (Network Stacks, Security Stacks, etc.). Stacks allow for granular, policy-based updates across multiple sites without the destructive or rigid nature of re-applying a full site initialization template. Therefore, D is not the aligned best practice.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

According to Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN administrator documentation regarding Path Policy configuration, specific rules apply when utilizing Standard VPNs (IPSec tunnels to non-ION devices, such as Prisma Access or third-party firewalls) as an L3 Failure Path.

When a Path Policy rule is configured, the administrator defines Active Paths, Backup Paths, and L3 Failure Paths. The L3 Failure Path is a "last resort" mechanism used when all Active and Backup paths are unavailable (Layer 3 down).

If Standard VPN is selected as the L3 Failure Path type, the system explicitly requires that the administrator also associates it with a specific Standard Services and DC Group within that same policy rule.

The ION device uses the Standard Services and DC Group to identify the specific remote endpoint (tunnel destination) where the traffic should be routed. Unlike a "Direct" (Internet) path which can simply route out to the WAN, a Standard VPN represents a logical tunnel. If the policy rule designates "Standard VPN" as the failure path but leaves the "Standard Services and DC Group" field empty or unselected, the ION effectively has a directive to "use a VPN" but lacks the instruction on which VPN group to use for this specific application context. Consequently, even if the IPSec tunnel to Prisma Access is physically up and stable, the policy engine cannot resolve the next hop for the "SuperSaaSApp" traffic, resulting in the packets being dropped. To resolve this, the administrator must edit the Path Policy rule to ensure the specific Standard Service/DC Group representing Prisma Access is checked/selected for the L3 Failure Path.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Prisma SD-WAN utilizes a sophisticated decision engine for Application-Based Path Selection that goes beyond simple failover. When configuring a Path Policy, the administrator defines "Active" paths and a "Path Quality Profile" (SLA).

SLA Compliance (The Filter): First, the system filters the available paths based on the Path Quality Profile. In this scenario, both ISP-A and ISP-B have 40ms latency against a 150ms threshold. Both are "green" or compliant paths.

Selection Criteria (The Tie-Breaker): When multiple paths are configured as "Active" and all meet the performance SLA, the ION device aims to optimize the overall user experience and network utilization. The default behavior for load balancing across healthy, compliant active paths is to select the path with the highest available bandwidth capacity.

By steering new flows to the link with the most "headroom" (available Mbps), the system prevents the saturation of a smaller link (e.g., a 20Mbps DSL line) while a larger link (e.g., 1Gbps Fiber) sits underutilized. This maximizes the aggregate throughput for the site. While latency is the qualifier, bandwidth availability is often the selector for compliant paths. Note that if the application was defined as "Real-Time" and configured for packet duplication, behavior would differ, but for standard traffic, capacity-based distribution is the standard active/active logic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

This behavior describes the "Best Available Path" logic inherent in Prisma SD-WAN's availability design.

SLA Thresholds: Path Quality Profiles act as filters to identify compliant paths.

Total Violation: If all configured "Active" paths violate the SLA (e.g., Path A has 2% loss, Path B has 5% loss, and the threshold is 1%), the system does not drop the traffic (Option A) because maintaining connectivity is prioritized over perfect quality.

Selection Logic: The system enters a fallback state where it compares the available active paths and selects the "Least Bad" one—the path that is closest to meeting the SLA (in this case, Path A with 2% loss).

Backup Paths: Traffic would only move to a Backup path (Option D) if the policy explicitly configures the backup path to engage upon SLA violation of the active set. However, strictly speaking, if only active paths are considered and all fail, it picks the best of the active group rather than blackholing the traffic.

The Prisma SD-WAN (ION) device includes a native, application-aware Zone-Based Firewall (ZBFW) that provides comprehensive security within the branch without the mandatory requirement for additional hardware.2 The fundamental principle of this architecture is the grouping of interfaces and sub-interfaces into logical Security Zones.3 Once these zones are defined (e.g., LAN, WAN, Guest, IoT), the administrator can create security policies that govern the traffic permitted to flow between them.4

Unlike traditional routers that rely on stateless Access Control Lists (ACLs) which are difficult to manage and lack application visibility, the Prisma SD-WAN ZBFW is stateful and application-aware.5 This means it can apply granular control over North-South traffic (flows moving between the LAN and the WAN/Internet) and East-West traffic (flows moving between different segments within the LAN, such as from a Guest zone to a Corporate zone).6

By using security zones, an ION device can ensure that even if two local networks are connected to the same physical appliance, they remain completely isolated unless a specific policy explicitly allows communication. This "Zero Trust" approach at the branch edge allows organizations to segment vulnerable devices (like IoT) from critical internal resources and strictly control how users access the internet or the corporate data center.7 The ZBFW works in tandem with the global controller to ensure that security postures are consistent across all branch locations, eliminating the complexity of manual ACL management at each site.8

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The transition from "Claimed" to "Online" depends entirely on the ION device's ability to establish a secure, persistent management tunnel to the Prisma SD-WAN Controller.

Connectivity Requirements: The ION device initiates an outbound connection to the controller on TCP Port 443 (HTTPS). It also requires accurate time synchronization to validate SSL certificates, necessitating access to NTP (UDP Port 123).

Scenario Analysis: Since the installer can browse the internet from the LAN, we know the physical link and basic routing/NAT are functional. The issue is specific to the management plane traffic.

Root Cause: If an upstream firewall (e.g., a corporate edge firewall or ISP filter) is inspecting SSL traffic or blocking specific FQDNs/Ports required by the ION, the device cannot complete the handshake. Consequently, it remains "Claimed" (registered in the database) but cannot go "Online" (active management session). Options A, C, and D prevent provisioning (configuration push) but generally do not prevent the device from initially checking in and going "Online" if the pipe is open.

In Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS SD-WAN environments, automation and orchestration are key components for service providers managing large-scale deployments. The PAN-OS REST API provides a modern, structured way to programmatically manage configuration objects, including those required for SD-WAN functionality.

When an application is designed to push changes directly to devices (individual firewalls) rather than through a centralized template in Panorama, it must interact with the firewall's local REST API. To successfully create a virtual SD-WAN interface, the application must target the correct resource URI. In the PAN-OS API schema, the logical SD-WAN interface—which groups physical links to enable application-based path selection—is managed via the sdwanInterfaces parameter within the REST API.

It is important to distinguish between the interface itself and the profiles that support it. Option A refers to sdwanInterfaceprofiles, which are the objects used to define the characteristics of a link (such as bandwidth, link type, and monitoring frequency), but not the interface itself. Furthermore, since the scenario specifies making changes "directly to devices," the target must be the firewall rather than Panorama. While Panorama can manage these objects via templates, a direct-to-device automation workflow necessitates using the firewall’s REST API endpoint. Utilizing the REST API over the legacy XML API is the recommended standard for modern integrations due to its ease of use with JSON payloads and alignment with contemporary DevSecOps practices. By using the sdwanInterfaces parameter on the firewall, the MSP application can programmatically bind physical Layer 3 interfaces to the SD-WAN fabric.

In a Data Center (DC) deployment, the ION device typically peers with a core router via Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) to exchange reachability information between the SD-WAN fabric and the legacy corporate network.2 When the ION is configured to learn only a default route ($0.0.0.0/0$) from the core, the entire SD-WAN fabric relies on this single BGP-learned route to reach internal resources not directly connected to the ION.

The primary risk in this design is network isolation caused by a BGP misconfiguration or a "soft failure" on the core router. If the BGP session stays "Up" but the core router stops advertising the default route due to a configuration error, the ION device will remove the route from its routing table. Without a valid path to the core, the branch sites connected to the DC ION will lose connectivity to all data center resources.

To mitigate this, the recommended best practice is to add a static default route with a higher Administrative Distance (AD) pointing to the core peer IPs.3 This acts as a "floating static route." Under normal operations, the BGP-learned default route (typically with an AD of 20 for eBGP) remains active in the routing table. If the BGP advertisement fails, the static route with the higher AD (e.g., 250) becomes active. This ensures that the ION device maintains a persistent gateway toward the core infrastructure, preventing total fabric isolation and providing a fail-safe mechanism while the BGP peering issue is remediated. While BFD (Option A) helps with fast peer failure detection, it does not solve the issue of a missing prefix advertisement. Static route redundancy provides the necessary architectural "safety net" for the data center's reachability.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In the Prisma SD-WAN Data Center (DC) model, the terminology for BGP peers defines their role in the topology and how the system generates route maps.

Core Peer: This peer type is designated for the LAN-side connection (facing the DC Core Switch or internal Routers). Its primary purpose is to learn the subnets/prefixes hosted in the data center so the ION can advertise them to the remote branches. The system automatically creates route maps to facilitate this redistribution into the fabric.

Edge Peer: This peer type is designated for the WAN-side connection (facing the Edge Router or MPLS PE). Its primary purpose is to provide reachability to the underlay network.

Distinction: Selecting the correct type affects the default Route Maps and Prefix Lists generated by the controller. Configuring a Core Peer correctly ensures that the DC's internal subnets are properly learned and propagated to the overlay, whereas an Edge Peer configuration focuses on WAN next-hop reachability.

Palo Alto Networks utilizes an aggregate throughput model for Prisma SD-WAN licensing.1 The minimum bandwidth subscription required for a branch ION is determined by the maximum traffic (the sum of both ingress and egress) that passes through the ION device. This is often referred to as "Aggregate Throughput." It is a critical distinction in the Prisma SD-WAN architecture because the license must account for all traffic processed by the device, whether that traffic stays local (Direct Internet Access), goes to the Data Center via the VPN fabric, or moves between local LAN segments.

When sizing a subscription, engineers must evaluate the total capacity of the WAN circuits connected to the branch. For example, if a branch has two 100 Mbps internet circuits, the device is capable of processing 200 Mbps of egress traffic and 200 Mbps of ingress traffic simultaneously. However, the licensing is based on the aggregate peak throughput the customer expects to utilize across the device's interfaces.

Choosing an under-sized subscription based only on "fabric traffic" (Option B) or "ISP capacity" (Option D) without considering the total bi-directional flow can lead to artificial performance bottlenecks. If the traffic exceeds the licensed bandwidth, the ION device will police the traffic to the licensed limit, regardless of the physical port speed or the hardware's theoretical maximum. Therefore, the subscription must be aligned with the total actual traffic volume the device is expected to handle to ensure an optimal user experience and full utilization of available circuit bandwidth.

In the Prisma SD-WAN architecture, reachability between sites is managed by the Control Plane, which automatically advertises prefixes across the secure fabric based on their scope. If a branch site has successful Direct Internet Access (DIA) but is invisible to the Data Center (DC), it indicates that while the local ION is online, its internal network information has not been propagated to the rest of the SD-WAN fabric.

The most common cause for this behavior is that the LAN interfaces or static routes at the branch are configured with a Local scope rather than a Global scope. When a prefix is set to "Local," the ION device treats that network as reachable only within that specific site; it will not advertise that prefix to the Controller for distribution to other ION devices, such as those at the Data Center. By ensuring the LAN branch prefixes are set to "global" (Option B), the administrator instructs the ION device to share these routes with the global fabric.

Once the prefix is marked as global, the Prisma SD-WAN Controller identifies it as a reachable destination and updates the routing tables of all peer ION devices in the same domain, including the DC gateways. This allows the Data Center to build a valid path to the branch resources over the secure VPN tunnels. Options like creating static routes (Option A) or changing site modes (Option C) do not address the fundamental requirement of prefix advertisement within the software-defined fabric, which relies on correctly defined metadata like route scope.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The RMA replacement process in Prisma SD-WAN is designed to be seamless, leveraging the decoupling of logical configuration from physical hardware.

Replace Device Workflow: The administrator should use the "Replace Device" (or RMA) function within the portal. This workflow allows you to select the "Defective" device (old serial) and the "Replacement" device (new serial).

Configuration Transfer: Once executed, the system automatically binds the existing Device Shell (which contains all interface configs, routing policies, and site associations) to the new hardware's serial number. The new device, once connected to the internet, will "call home," identify itself, and download the exact configuration of the previous unit.

License Transfer: While the configuration moves automatically, the Support License transfer typically requires a specific step in the Customer Support Portal (CSP) or happens automatically if processed as a formal RMA order. Options A and D are incorrect because they involve manual reconfiguration, which is unnecessary and error-prone. Option C is incorrect as the ION platform relies on cloud-based config management, not local USB backups for hardware swaps.

When a Prisma SD-WAN ION device triggers the DEVICESW_CONCURRENT_FLOWLIMIT_EXCEEDED incident, it indicates that the number of active sessions has reached the hardware or software-defined capacity limit of that specific appliance. In the provided graph, we can see a massive spike in concurrent TCP flows on May 13th, reaching nearly 500k, which is a clear indicator of anomalous behavior—likely a "top talker" host, a malware outbreak, or a misconfigured application generating excessive connections.

To identify the specific host responsible for this surge, administrators should navigate to Monitor → Activity → Flows. This interface, commonly known as the Flow Browser, provides the most granular visibility into real-time and historical session data within the Prisma SD-WAN fabric. Unlike "Transaction Stats," which provide high-level summaries, or "New Flows," which only show the rate of session initiation, the Flows view allows an engineer to filter and sort the active session table by metadata such as Source IP, Destination IP, Application, and Site.

By utilizing the Flow Browser, an administrator can quickly group flows by "Source IP" to pinpoint exactly which internal host is consuming the most flow table entries. This is the standard "Day 2" operational workflow for troubleshooting performance and capacity incidents. While running a tcpdump (Option A) is a valid diagnostic for packet-level analysis, it is inefficient for identifying a single host among hundreds of thousands of flows and can further tax the device's CPU during a high-load event. The Monitor → Activity → Flows tool is designed specifically for this type of scale, providing the necessary visibility to remediate the flow limit exhaustion and restore normal network operations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In Prisma SD-WAN, security policies can be applied via Policy Stacks, which often have a hierarchy.

Stack Precedence: A common configuration involves a Global Security Stack (applied to all sites) and a Local/Site Security Stack (specific to one site). If the administrator configured a "Global" rule that says "Deny Access to Gambling Sites" (or a specific IP list), and that rule is higher in the binding order or part of a higher-priority stack, it will enforce the block before the local "Allow Guest to Internet" rule is processed.

Specifics of "REJECT": The state REJECT specifically implies a policy enforcement action (sending a TCP RST or ICMP Unreachable) rather than a silent drop or a routing failure.

Why not A? If the "Allow" rule is at the top and matches the traffic parameters (Zone/IP), the Default Deny at the bottom would never be reached. The issue implies a higher priority Deny exists.

Prisma SD-WAN licensing is structured to provide flexibility while ensuring that all components of the secure fabric are correctly accounted for. To meet the requirements of this organization, we must calculate the necessary subscriptions for both the data center hubs and the distributed branch network.

First, we address the Data Center Subscriptions. The organization has two main geographically separate data centers and one small data center, all of which require High Availability (HA). In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, HA at a site is achieved by deploying two ION devices in a cluster. Palo Alto Networks licensing requires a separate Data Center subscription for each ION device acting as a hub. Therefore, with three data center locations (2 main + 1 small) each requiring an HA pair (2 devices per site), a total of six data center subscriptions (Option A) are required to license all six hub appliances.

Second, we address the Branch Subscriptions. The organization has 50 branches but lacks accurate measurements of actual bandwidth consumption. Palo Alto Networks' best practice for such scenarios is the Aggregate Bandwidth Subscription model (Option B). Instead of purchasing a fixed "Branch subscription per site" (Option D)—which requires knowing the exact throughput needs for every individual location—the aggregate model allows the customer to purchase a total pool of bandwidth (e.g., 5 Gbps) that is shared across all 50 branch sites.

This "pay-as-you-grow" approach is ideal when consumption patterns are unknown or inconsistent. As branches utilize the bandwidth, it is deducted from the central pool. This avoids the risk of over-provisioning licenses at low-usage sites or under-provisioning at high-usage sites. Together, the six DC subscriptions and the aggregate bandwidth pool provide a fully licensed, HA-capable SD-WAN environment that aligns with Palo Alto Networks' scaling recommendations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Dynamic VPNs (also known as ION-to-ION or Branch-to-Branch VPNs) allow Prisma SD-WAN devices to establish direct, on-demand secure tunnels between branch sites to optimize latency for peer-to-peer traffic (e.g., VoIP calls between offices).

To enable this capability, the primary architectural requirement is the configuration of VPN Clusters.

A VPN Cluster defines a logical group of devices that are authorized to communicate with one another.

By default, or if devices are in different clusters without peering, the topology typically defaults to Hub-and-Spoke, where branches only talk to the Data Center.

When two branch ION devices are placed into the same VPN Cluster (or peered clusters), the controller shares the necessary reachability and cryptographic information between them.

Once in the same cluster, the ION devices monitor traffic. If a user at Branch A tries to contact a server at Branch B, the ION devices detect this interest. If a direct path is available (e.g., via public internet), they will dynamically negotiate a direct VPN tunnel, bypassing the Data Center hub. This offloads the hub and reduces latency. Option B is incorrect because SD-WAN eliminates manual GRE config. Option C is incorrect because dynamic VPNs are a performance feature, not just a disaster recovery feature.

In the Prisma SD-WAN solution, multi-tenancy and network isolation are achieved through the use of Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances. However, there are many operational scenarios—such as providing shared access to a common service (e.g., DNS, NTP) or a central Internet gateway—where traffic must transition between these isolated routing domains. This process is known as route leaking.

In the Prisma SD-WAN management interface, route leaking is specifically configured within the VRF Profile. Unlike traditional CLI-based routers where route leaking might be configured under a global routing table or individual VRF definitions via import/export targets, Prisma SD-WAN utilizes a profile-based approach to ensure scalability and consistency across multiple sites. A VRF Profile acts as a template that defines the routing behavior for specific VRFs across the fabric.

When an administrator navigates to the VRF Profile settings, they can define "Leaking Rules." These rules specify the "From VRF" (source) and "To VRF" (destination) parameters, along with the specific prefixes or default routes that should be shared. By placing this configuration within the VRF Profile rather than a site-specific configuration, Palo Alto Networks allows for a "configure once, apply many" workflow. Once the VRF Profile is updated with the leaking rules, any ION device associated with that profile will automatically update its local routing table to allow the specified inter-VRF communication. This centralized orchestration simplifies the management of complex segmentation requirements in large-scale SD-WAN deployments.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The Prisma SD-WAN (ION) QoS engine utilizes a hierarchical queuing structure designed to provide granular control over application performance. Each WAN interface on an ION device supports a total of 16 QoS queues.

This 16-queue structure is derived from a matrix of 4 Classes (often referred to as Priority Classes) multiplied by 4 Application Criteria (Traffic Types).2

4 Priority Classes: The system defines four high-level business priority categories:3

Platinum (Highest priority)4

Gold

Silver

Bronze (Lowest priority/Best Effort)5

4 Application Criteria (Sub-queues): Within each of the four priority classes, the system further categorizes traffic into four specific application types to ensure proper handling (e.g., ensuring voice doesn't get stuck behind bulk data even within the same priority level):6

Real-Time Video

Real-Time Audio

Transactional

Bulk7

Calculation: 4 Priority Classes × 4 Application Types = 16 Total Queues per interface. This structure allows the scheduler to ensure that a "Platinum" voice call is prioritized over "Platinum" bulk data, and both are prioritized over "Gold" traffic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In Prisma SD-WAN (CloudGenix), Path Policies control how application traffic is steered across WAN links. To ensure that traffic is automatically shifted from a saturated circuit to another circuit with available bandwidth, both circuits must be configured as Active Paths within the policy rule.

When multiple paths are designated as "Active," the ION device treats them as a shared pool of available resources. The system continuously monitors the bandwidth utilization (capacity) and health (latency, jitter, loss) of all active links. If "Circuit A" (500 Mbps) becomes saturated or approaches its defined bandwidth limit, the ION's intelligent scheduler will automatically direct new application flows to "Circuit B" (100 Mbps) because it is a valid, healthy Active path with available capacity. This achieves effective load balancing and bandwidth aggregation.

In contrast, configuring "Circuit B" as a Backup Path (Option A or B) creates a strict priority relationship. Traffic would only move to the Backup path if the Active path completely failed or violated its configured SLA (Path Quality Profile) significantly enough to be considered "down." Mere bandwidth saturation might not trigger an SLA failure immediately, potentially leading to dropped packets on the saturated link while the backup link remains idle. Therefore, placing Both circuits under active path is the correct configuration for dynamic capacity management.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

This scenario depicts a High Availability (HA) topology utilizing the ION 1200-S model's Fail-to-Wire (bypass) capabilities to share WAN links between two devices without needing external switches for every WAN connection.

1. WAN Link Availability (Statement A):

The diagram illustrates a "daisy-chain" cabling method supported by the ION 1200-S bypass pairs.

ISP A (Green): Connects directly to the "Standby" (Left) unit first. Since the Standby unit remains powered on, it maintains direct access to ISP A.

LTE/5G (Blue): Connects to the "Active" (Right) unit first. The connection then loops through a bypass pair on the Active unit to the Standby unit. When power is removed from the "Active" unit, the fail-to-wire relays on its Ethernet ports close physically. This creates a passive electrical bridge that connects the LTE modem directly to the Standby unit. The Standby unit (now becoming Active) will detect the link state change and successfully utilize the LTE connection. Therefore, both WAN links remain usable.

2. LAN Failover Mechanism (Statement C):

Prisma SD-WAN ION devices typically use a VRRP-like mechanism for LAN redundancy.

When the "Active" node fails (loses power), the "Standby" node stops receiving keepalives and promotes itself to the Active state.

To ensure downstream switches and clients immediately send traffic to the new Active unit, it must update their ARP tables. It does this by broadcasting a Gratuitous ARP (GARP) packet for the Virtual IP (VIP) address of the Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs). This action informs the network that the MAC address associated with the Gateway I1P is now reachable via the port connected to the new Active ION.234